Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27068760›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2016

'Some anti-malarials are too strong for your body, they will harm you.' Socio-cultural factors influencing pregnant women's adherence to anti-malarial treatment in rural Gambia.

Fatou Jaiteh, Susan Dierickx, Charlotte Gryseels, Sarah O'Neill, Umberto D'Alessandro, Susana Scott, Julie Balen, Koen Peeters Grietens

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Investigations of socioeconomic factors associated with follow-up compliance with malaria treatment in Haiti.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Fatou JaitehDepartment of Geography, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. fjaiteh@mrc.gm.
Susan DierickxDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Charlotte GryseelsDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sarah O'NeillDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Umberto D'AlessandroDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Susana ScottMedical Research Council Unit, Fajara, The Gambia.
Julie BalenSchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Koen Peeters GrietensDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversity of Sheffield · GBMRC Unit the Gambia · GM

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/J002364/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite declining prevalence of malaria in The Gambia, non-adherence to anti-malarial treatment still remains a challenge to control efforts. There is limited evidence on the socio-cultural factors that influence adherence to anti-malarial treatment in pregnancy. This study explored perceptions of malaria in pregnancy and their influence on adherence to anti-malarial treatment in a rural area of The Gambia.

methodsAn exploratory ethnographic study was conducted ancillary to a cluster-randomized trial on scheduled screening and treatment of malaria in pregnancy at village level in the Upper River Region of The Gambia from June to August 2014. Qualitative data were collected through interviewing and participant observation. Analysis was concurrent to data collection and carried out using NVivo 10.

resultsAlthough women had good bio-medical knowledge of malaria in pregnancy, adherence to anti-malarial treatment was generally perceived to be low. Pregnant women were perceived to discontinue the provided anti-malarial treatment after one or 2 days mainly due to non-recognition of symptoms, perceived ineffectiveness of the anti-malarial treatment, the perceived risks of medication and advice received from mothers-in-law.

conclusionImproving women's knowledge of malaria in pregnancy is not sufficient to assure adherence to anti-malarial treatment. Addressing structural barriers such as unclear health workers' messages about medication dosage, illness recognition, side effects of the medication and the integration of relatives, especially the mothers-in-law, in community-based programmes are additionally required.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntimalarialsFemaleGambiaHumansInterviews as TopicMalariaMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRural PopulationAntimalarialsAdherenceAnti-malarialsPregnancyRural Gambia

Identifiers

PMID27068760
PMCPMC4827243
OpenAlexW2325093909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.