Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27068655›Full record

ArticleVirologica Sinica2016

Immunogenicity of multi-epitope-based vaccine candidates administered with the adjuvant Gp96 against rabies.

Yange Niu, Ye Liu, Limin Yang, Hongren Qu, Jingyi Zhao, Rongliang Hu, Jing Li, Wenjun Liu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virologica Sinica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yange NiuKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Ye LiuLaboratory of Epidemiology and Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Veterinary Research Institute, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Changchun, 130122, China.
Limin YangKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Hongren QuKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Jingyi ZhaoBeijing Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention Chinese Veterinary Medical Association of Animal Clinic Branch, Beijing, 102629, China.
Rongliang HuLaboratory of Epidemiology and Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Veterinary Research Institute, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Changchun, 130122, China.
Jing LiKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. lj418@163.com.
Wenjun LiuKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. liuwj@im.ac.cn.
Academy of Military Medical Sciences · CNInstitute of Microbiology · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNChina Animal Disease Control Center · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies, a zoonotic disease, causes > 55,000 human deaths globally and results in at least 500 million dollars in losses every year. The currently available rabies vaccines are mainly inactivated and attenuated vaccines, which have been linked with clinical diseases in animals. Thus, a rabies vaccine with high safety and efficacy is urgently needed. Peptide vaccines are known for their low cost, simple production procedures and high safety. Therefore, in this study, we examined the efficacy of multi-epitope-based vaccine candidates against rabies virus. The ability of various peptides to induce epitope-specific responses was examined, and the two peptides that possessed the highest antigenicity and conservation, i.e., AR16 and hPAB, were coated with adjuvant canine-Gp96 and used to prepare vaccines. The peptides were prepared as an emulsion of oil in water (O/W) to create three batches of bivalent vaccine products. The vaccine candidates possessed high safety. Virus neutralizing antibodies were detected on the day 14 after the first immunization in mice and beagles, reaching 5-6 IU/mL in mice and 7-9 IU/mL in beagles by day 28. The protective efficacy of the vaccine candidates was about 70%-80% in mice challenged by a virulent strain of rabies virus. Thus, a novel multi-epitope-based rabies vaccine with Gp96 as an adjuvant was developed and validated in mice and dogs. Our results suggest that synthetic peptides hold promise for the development of novel vaccines against rabies.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralChemistry Techniques, SyntheticDogsEpitopesFemaleGlycoproteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsImmunogenicity, VaccineMiceMice, Inbred BALB CRabbitsRabiesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralEpitopesglycoprotein G, Rabies virusGlycoproteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsRabies VaccinesRecombinant ProteinsVaccines, SubunitViral Envelope ProteinsGp96immunogenicity evaluationmulti-epitope-based vaccinerabies virus

Identifiers

PMID27068655
PMCPMC8193451
OpenAlexW2338132964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.