Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27068419›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2016

Noise and Epigenetic Inheritance of Single-Cell Division Times Influence Population Fitness.

Bram Cerulus, Aaron M New, Ksenia Pougach, Kevin J Verstrepen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stochasticity in mammalian cell growth rates drives cell-to-cell variability independently of cell size and divisions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An expanded view of cell competition.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  6. Accelerating Diverse Cell-Based Therapies Through Scalable Design.Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering · 2024
    Review
  7. Collective effects of cell cleavage dynamics.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploring the expanse between theoretical questions and experimental approaches in the modern study of evolvability.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bram CerulusKU Leuven Department Microbiële en Moleculaire Systemen, CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; VIB Laboratory of Systems Biology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Aaron M NewKU Leuven Department Microbiële en Moleculaire Systemen, CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; VIB Laboratory of Systems Biology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona 08002, Spain.
Ksenia PougachKU Leuven Department Microbiële en Moleculaire Systemen, CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; VIB Laboratory of Systems Biology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Kevin J VerstrepenKU Leuven Department Microbiële en Moleculaire Systemen, CMPG Laboratory of Genetics and Genomics, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; VIB Laboratory of Systems Biology, Gaston Geenslaan 1, 3001 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: kevin.verstrepen@biw.vib-kuleuven.be.
KU Leuven · BECentre for Genomic Regulation · ES

Funding

European Research Council 682009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fitness effect of biological noise remains unclear. For example, even within clonal microbial populations, individual cells grow at different speeds. Although it is known that the individuals' mean growth speed can affect population-level fitness, it is unclear how or whether growth speed heterogeneity itself is subject to natural selection. Here, we show that noisy single-cell division times can significantly affect population-level growth rate. Using time-lapse microscopy to measure the division times of thousands of individual S. cerevisiae cells across different genetic and environmental backgrounds, we find that the length of individual cells' division times can vary substantially between clonal individuals and that sublineages often show epigenetic inheritance of division times. By combining these experimental measurements with mathematical modeling, we find that, for a given mean division time, increasing heterogeneity and epigenetic inheritance of division times increases the population growth rate. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the heterogeneity and epigenetic inheritance of single-cell division times can be linked with variation in the expression of catabolic genes. Taken together, our results reveal how a change in noisy single-cell behaviors can directly influence fitness through dynamics that operate independently of effects caused by changes to the mean. These results not only allow a better understanding of microbial fitness but also help to more accurately predict fitness in other clonal populations, such as tumors.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenetic FitnessSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTime FactorsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27068419
PMCPMC5428746
OpenAlexW2327354509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.