Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27068178›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2016

Neural mechanisms of sensitivity to peer information in young adult cannabis users.

Jodi M Gilman, Randi M Schuster, Max T Curran, Vanessa Calderon, Andre van der Kouwe, A Eden Evins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural underpinnings of maladaptive decision-making in addictions.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2018
    Review
  13. Cognitive functioning of adolescent and young adult cannabis users in the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jodi M GilmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. jgilman1@partners.org.
Randi M SchusterDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Max T CurranDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Vanessa CalderonDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Andre van der KouweDepartment of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center in Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
A Eden EvinsDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Medical Marijuana, Neurocognition, and Subsequent Substance UseR01DA042043 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GILMAN, JODI · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Mentoring in Addiction Treatment ResearchK24DA030443 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EVINS, A EDEN · 2010 to 2020
$2.0M
Cognitive Recovery With Cannabis Abstinence Among High School-Aged AdolescentsK23DA042946 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHUSTER, RANDI MELISSA · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
Neurobehavioral Characterization of Social Influence in Drug AddictionK01DA034093 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GILMAN, JODI · 2013 to 2017
$925k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA034093NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA042946NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA030443NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA034327NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though social influence is a critical factor in the initiation and maintenance of marijuana use, the neural correlates of influence in those who use marijuana are unknown. In this study, marijuana-using young adults (MJ; n = 20) and controls (CON; n = 23) performed a decision-making task in which they made a perceptual choice after viewing the choices of unknown peers via photographs, while they underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging scans. The MJ and CON groups did not show differences in the overall number of choices that agreed with versus opposed group influence, but only the MJ group showed reaction time slowing when deciding against group choices. Longer reaction times were associated with greater activation of frontal regions. The MJ goup, compared to CON, showed significantly greater activation in the caudate when presented with peer information. Across groups, caudate activation was associated with self-reported susceptibility to influence. These findings indicate that young adults who use MJ may exhibit increased effort when confronted with opposing peer influence, as well as exhibit greater responsivity of the caudate to social information. These results not only better define the neural basis of social decisions, but also suggest that marijuana use is associated with exaggerated neural activity during decision making that involves social information.

Indexed as

Brain MappingPeer GroupAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceBrainCase-Control StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLinear ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMarijuana SmokingNeuropsychological TestsOxygenCannabisMarijuanaNucleus accumbensPeer groupsRewardSocial influence

Identifiers

PMID27068178
PMCPMC4955693
OpenAlexW2337357326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.