Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27067896›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED): a study protocol for a quasi-experimental, before-after trial aimed at reducing pulmonary complications.

Brian M Fuller, Ian Ferguson, Nicholas M Mohr, Robert J Stephens, Cristopher C Briscoe, Angelina A Kolomiets, Richard S Hotchkiss, Marin H Kollef

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02543554 (The Effect of Lung Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department on the Incidence of Pulmonary Complications and Clinical Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02543554 completednot on this map

The Effect of Lung Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department on the Incidence of Pulmonary Complications and Clinical Outcomes

TypeobservationalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2014 to 2016Enrolled1,705ConditionsMechanical Ventilation, Ventilator-associated Conditions, ARDSArmslung protective ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian M FullerDivision of Critical Care, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Ian FergusonSchool of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Nicholas M MohrDivision of Critical Care, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Robert J StephensWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Cristopher C BriscoeWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Angelina A KolomietsSchool of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Richard S HotchkissDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Marin H KollefDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USSaint Louis University · USUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
PREVENTION OF APOPTOTIC CELL DEATH IN SEPSIS BY BCL-2R01GM044118 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOTCHKISS, RICHARD SAMUEL · 1992 to 2017
$2.7M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesTL1TR000449 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000449NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044118NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM09839NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM44118-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn critically ill patients, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and ventilator-associated conditions (VACs) are associated with increased mortality, survivor morbidity and healthcare resource utilisation. Studies conclusively demonstrate that initial ventilator settings in patients with ARDS, and at risk for it, impact outcome. No studies have been conducted in the emergency department (ED) to determine if lung-protective ventilation in patients at risk for ARDS can reduce its incidence. Since the ED is the entry point to the intensive care unit for hundreds of thousands of mechanically ventilated patients annually in the USA, this represents a knowledge gap in this arena. A lung-protective ventilation strategy was instituted in our ED in 2014. It aims to address the parameters in need of quality improvement, as demonstrated by our previous research: (1) prevention of volutrauma; (2) appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure setting; (3) prevention of hyperoxia; and (4) aspiration precautions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The lung-protective ventilation initiated in the emergency department (LOV-ED) trial is a single-centre, quasi-experimental before-after study testing the hypothesis that lung-protective ventilation, initiated in the ED, is associated with reduced pulmonary complications. An intervention cohort of 513 mechanically ventilated adult ED patients will be compared with over 1000 preintervention control patients. The primary outcome is a composite outcome of pulmonary complications after admission (ARDS and VACs). Multivariable logistic regression with propensity score adjustment will test the hypothesis that ED lung-protective ventilation decreases the incidence of pulmonary complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of the study was obtained prior to data collection on the first patient. As the study is a before-after observational study, examining the effect of treatment changes over time, it is being conducted with waiver of informed consent. This work will be disseminated by publication of full-length manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at major scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02543554.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalLungVentilators, MechanicalAdultClinical ProtocolsCohort StudiesCritical CareCritical IllnessFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleResearch DesignRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEARDSmechanical ventilationventilator-associated conditions

Identifiers

PMID27067896
PMCPMC4838728
OpenAlexW2338150341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.