Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27067889›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Cluster randomised controlled trial of a financial incentive for mothers to improve breast feeding in areas with low breastfeeding rates: the NOSH study protocol.

Clare Relton, Mark Strong, Mary J Renfrew, Kate Thomas, Julia Burrows, Barbara Whelan, Heather M Whitford, Elaine Scott, Julia Fox-Rushby, Nana Anoyke and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Clare ReltonPublic Health Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mark StrongSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mary J RenfrewMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Kate ThomasSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Julia BurrowsSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Barbara WhelanPublic Health Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Heather M WhitfordMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Elaine ScottPublic Health Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Julia Fox-RushbyHealth Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Nana AnoykeHealth Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Sabina SangheraHealth Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Maxine JohnsonPublic Health Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sue EastonPublic Health Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Stephen WaltersSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J000434/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast feeding can promote positive long-term and short-term health outcomes in infant and mother. The UK has one of the lowest breastfeeding rates (duration and exclusivity) in the world, resulting in preventable morbidities and associated healthcare costs. Breastfeeding rates are also socially patterned, thereby potentially contributing to health inequalities. Financial incentives have been shown to have a positive effect on health behaviours in previously published studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Based on data from earlier development and feasibility stages, a cluster (electoral ward) randomised trial with mixed-method process and content evaluation was designed. The 'Nourishing Start for Health' (NOSH) intervention comprises a financial incentive programme of up to 6 months duration, delivered by front-line healthcare professionals, in addition to existing breastfeeding support. The intervention aims to increase the prevalence and duration of breast feeding in wards with low breastfeeding rates. The comparator is usual care (no offer of NOSH intervention). Routine data on breastfeeding rates at 6-8 weeks will be collected for 92 clusters (electoral wards) on an estimated 10,833 births. This sample is calculated to provide 80% power in determining a 4% point difference in breastfeeding rates between groups. Content and process evaluation will include interviews with mothers, healthcare providers, funders and commissioners of infant feeding services. The economic analyses, using a healthcare provider's perspective, will be twofold, including a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis and beyond-trial modelling of longer term expectations for cost-effectiveness. Results of economic analyses will be expressed as cost per percentage point change in cluster level in breastfeeding rates between trial arms. In addition, we will present difference in resource use impacts for a range of acute conditions in babies aged 0-6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Participating organisations Research and Governance departments approved the study. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and at conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN44898617; Pre-results.

Indexed as

MotivationRewardAdolescentAdultBreast FeedingCluster AnalysisCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersUnited KingdomYoung AdultBreastfeedingcluster RCTfinancial incentivesprotocol

Identifiers

PMID27067889
PMCPMC4838737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.