Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27067670›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

A multistage controlled intervention to increase stair climbing at work: effectiveness and process evaluation.

Alice Bellicha, Aurélie Kieusseian, Anne-Marie Fontvieille, Antonio Tataranni, Nane Copin, Hélène Charreire, Jean-Michel Oppert

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Signage Interventions for Stair Climbing at Work: More than 700,000 Reasons for Caution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alice BellichaInstitute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), University Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France.
Aurélie KieusseianInstitute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), University Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France.
Anne-Marie FontvieilleSanofi, 54 rue La Boetie, Paris, 75008, France.
Antonio TataranniSanofi, 54 rue La Boetie, Paris, 75008, France.
Nane CopinInstitute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), University Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France.
Hélène CharreireDepartment of Geography, Lab-Urba, Urbanism Institute of Paris, University Paris-Est, Creteil, France.
Jean-Michel OppertInstitute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), University Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France. jean-michel.oppert@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStair climbing helps to accumulate short bouts of physical activity throughout the day as a strategy for attaining recommended physical activity levels. There exists a need for effective long-term stair-climbing interventions that can be transferred to various worksite settings. The aims of this study were: 1) to evaluate short- and long-term effectiveness of a worksite stair-climbing intervention using an objective measurement of stair climbing and a controlled design; and 2) to perform a process evaluation of the intervention.

methodsWe performed a controlled before-and-after study. The study was conducted in two corporate buildings of the same company located in Paris (France), between September, 2013 and September, 2014. The status of either "intervention site" or "control site" was assigned by the investigators. Participants were on-site employees (intervention site: n = 783; control site: n = 545 at baseline). Two one-month intervention phases using signs (intervention phase 1) and enhancement of stairwell aesthetics (intervention phase 2) were performed. The main outcome was the change in stair climbing, measured with automatic counters and expressed in absolute counts/day/100 employees and percent change compared to baseline. Qualitative outcomes were used to describe the intervention process.

resultsStair climbing significantly increased at the intervention site (+18.7%) but decreased at the control site (-13.3%) during the second intervention phase (difference between sites: +4.6 counts/day/100 employees, p < 0.001). After the intervention and over the long term, stair climbing returned to baseline levels at the intervention site, but a significant difference between sites was found (intervention site vs. control site: +2.9 counts/day/100 employees, p < 0.05). Some important facets of the intervention were implemented as intended but other aspects had to be adapted. The main difficulty reported by the company's staff members lay in matching the internal communications rules with critical intervention criteria. The program was maintained at the setting level after the end of the study.

conclusionsThis study shows a successful stair-climbing intervention at the worksite. The main barriers to adoption and implementation were related to location and visibility of posters. Process evaluation was useful in identifying these barriers throughout the study, and in finding appropriate solutions.

Indexed as

Health PromotionOccupational Health ServicesWalkingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareParisWorkWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID27067670
PMCPMC4827230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.