Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27067591›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2016

Worldwide burden of colorectal cancer: a review.

Pasqualino Favoriti, Gabriele Carbone, Marco Greco, Felice Pirozzi, Raffaele Emmanuele Maria Pirozzi, Francesco Corcione

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07512817 (The Effect of Online Solution- Focused Group Counseling On Adjustment, Psychological Well- Being and Resilience in Individuals), which is not on this map. Cited by 349 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
349citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07512817 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Online Solution- Focused Group Counseling On Adjustment, Psychological Well- Being and Resilience in Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled48ConditionsAdjustment, Resilience, Psychological Well-beingArmsSolution- focused group counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

349 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

289 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pasqualino FavoritiDepartment of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Gabriele CarboneDepartment of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Marco GrecoDepartment of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Felice PirozziDepartment of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy. felice.pirozzi@hotmail.it.
Raffaele Emmanuele Maria PirozziSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Francesco CorcioneDepartment of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital, Via Leonardo Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a major public health problem, being the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth cause of cancer death worldwide. There is wide variation over time among the different geographic areas due to variable exposure to risk factors, introduction and uptake of screening as well as access to appropriate treatment services. Indeed, a large proportion of the disparities may be attributed to socioeconomic status. Although colorectal cancer continues to be a disease of the developed world, incidence rates have been rising in developing countries. Moreover, the global burden is expected to further increase due to the growth and aging of the population and because of the adoption of westernized behaviors and lifestyle. Colorectal cancer screening has been proven to greatly reduce mortality rates that have declined in many longstanding as well as newly economically developed countries. Statistics on colorectal cancer occurrence are essential to develop targeted strategies that could alleviate the burden of the disease. The aim of this paper is to provide a review of incidence, mortality and survival rates for colorectal cancer as well as their geographic variations and temporal trends.

Indexed as

Public HealthColorectal NeoplasmsGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival RateColorectal cancerEpidemiologyIncidenceMortality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.