Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27067520›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of infection control2016

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in cell phones of health care workers from Peruvian pediatric and neonatal intensive care units.

Steev Loyola, Luz R Gutierrez, Gertrudis Horna, Kyle Petersen, Juan Agapito, Jorge Osada, Paul Rios, Andres G Lescano, Jesus Tamariz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of infection control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Whole-Genome Characterisation of ESBL-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of 6 Methods for Aerobic Bacterial Sanitization of Smartphones.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steev LoyolaUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima, Peru. Electronic address: steev.loyola@gmail.com.
Luz R GutierrezUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Gertrudis HornaUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Kyle PetersenU.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima, Peru.
Juan AgapitoUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Jorge OsadaUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo, Chiclayo, Peru.
Paul RiosU.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima, Peru.
Andres G LescanoUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima, Peru.
Jesus TamarizUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.

Funding

Peru Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Research Training ConsortiumD43TW007393 · FIC · UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA · PI Andres G Lescano · 2005 to 2026
$5.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW007393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care workers (HCWs) use their mobile phones during working hours or medical care. There is evidence that the instruments are colonized with pathogenic microorganisms. Here, we describe levels of Enterobacteriaceae contamination (EC) in cell phones and the risk factors associated with EC in Peruvian intensive care units (ICUs).

methodsThis was a 5-month cohort study among 114 HCWs of 3 pediatric and 2 neonatology ICUs from 3 Peruvian hospitals. A baseline survey collected data on risk factors associated with EC. Swabs were collected from HCWs' phones every other week.

resultsThree-quarters of HCWs never decontaminated their phones, and 47% reported using the phones in the ICU >5 times while working. EC was frequent across samplings and sites and was substantially higher in subjects with longer follow-up. Potential risk factors identified did not have strong associations with positive samples (relative risk, 0.7-1.5), regardless of significance. Half of the phones were colonized with an Enterobacteriaceae at least once during the 4 samplings attained on average during the study period. Half of the isolates were multidrug resistant (MDR), and 33% were extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers.

conclusionsEC on HCWs' phones was frequent and apparently randomly distributed through the hospitals without clear clustering or strongly associated risk factors for having a positive sample. Based on the level of EC, phones may be considered as potential bacterial reservoirs of MDR and ESBL bacteria.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneHealth Personnelbeta-LactamasesCohort StudiesEnterobacteriaceaeFomitesHospitals, PediatricHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricPerubeta-LactamasesCell phonesEnterobacteriaceaeHealth personnelInfectious disease transmission, professional-to-patient

Identifiers

PMID27067520
PMCPMC5253370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.