ArticleJournal of hepatology2016
A new fluorescence-based optical imaging method to non-invasively monitor hepatic myofibroblasts in vivo.
Article in Journal of hepatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of aScientific reports · 2024Article
- Enriched adipose stem cell secretome as an effective therapeutic strategy for in vivo wound repair and angiogenesis.3 Biotech · 2023Article
- Novel application of live imaging to determine the functional cell biology of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) within a liver-on-a-chip platform.In vitro models · 2022Article
- Application and trend of bioluminescence imaging in metabolic syndrome research.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Review
- In-vivo imaging revealed antigen-directed gingival B10 infiltration in experimental periodontitis.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2021Article
- c-Rel orchestrates energy-dependent epithelial and macrophage reprogramming in fibrosis.Nature metabolism · 2020Article
- Multimodal Nanocarrier Probes Reveal Superior Biodistribution Quantification by Isotopic Analysis over Fluorescence.ACS nano · 2020Article
- Live imaging of collagen deposition during experimental hepatic schistosomiasis and recovery: a view on a dynamic process.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2019Article
- P311, Friend, or Foe of Tissue Fibrosis?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Review
- A Proof-of-Concept for Epigenetic Therapy of Tissue Fibrosis: Inhibition of Liver Fibrosis Progression by 3-Deazaneplanocin A.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsCurrently, staging of fibrosis in preclinical rodent liver fibrosis models is achieved histologically. Many animals are used at multiple time-points to assess disease progression or therapeutic responses. Hepatic myofibroblasts promote liver fibrosis therefore quantifying these cells in vivo could assess disease or predict therapeutic responses in mice. We fluorescently labelled a single chain antibody (C1-3) that binds hepatic myofibroblasts to monitor fibrogenesis in vivo.
methodsCCl4 was used to induce acute liver injury in WT and cRel(-/-) mice. Bile duct ligation was used to model chronic fibrosis. Hepatic myofibroblasts were depleted using a liposome-drug delivery system or chemically with sulfasalazine. An IVIS® spectrum visualised fluorophore-conjugated C1-3 in vivo.
resultsIVIS detection of fluorescently labelled-C1-3 but not a control antibody discriminates between fibrotic and non-fibrotic liver in acute and chronic liver fibrosis models. cRel(-/-) mice have a fibro-protective phenotype and IVIS signal is reduced in CCl4 injured cRel(-/-) mice compared to wild-type. In vivo imaging of fluorescently labelled-C1-3 successfully predicts reductions in hepatic myofibroblast numbers in fibrotic liver disease in response to therapy.
conclusionsWe report a novel fluorescence imaging method to assess murine hepatic myofibroblast numbers in vivo during liver fibrosis and after therapy. We also describe a novel liposomal antibody targeting system to selectively deliver drugs to hepatic myofibroblasts in vivo. C1-3 binds human hepatic myofibroblast therefore imaging labelled-C1-3 could be used for clinical studies in man to help stage fibrosis, demonstrate efficacy of drugs that promote hepatic myofibroblast clearance or predict early therapeutic responses. LAY SUMMARY: In response to damage and injury scars develop in the liver and the main cell that makes the scar tissue is the hepatic myofibroblast (HM). C1-3 is an antibody fragment that binds to the scar forming HM. We have fluorescently labelled C1-3 and given it to mice that have either normal or scarred livers (which contain HM) and then used a machine called an in vivo imaging system (IVIS) that takes pictures of different wavelengths of light, to visualise the antibody binding to HM inside the living mouse. Using fluorescently labelled C1-3 we can assess HM numbers in the injured liver and monitor response to therapy. We have also used C1-3 to target drugs encapsulated in lipid carriers (liposomes) to the HM to kill the HM and reduce the liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.