Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27067275›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2016

Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report.

Philipp Steiger, Harriet C Thoeny

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Toward confident prostate cancer detection using ultrasound: a multi-center study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. MRI-based radiomics models to assess prostate cancer, extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philipp SteigerDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland. Philipp.Steiger@med.unibe.ch.
Harriet C ThoenyDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology, and Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate imaging and interpretation is based on prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS™ v2) providing clinical guidelines for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate. PI-RADS™ v2 aims to promote global standardisation, to diminish variation in the acquisition, interpretation and reporting of prostate mpMRI examinations and to improve detection, localisation, and risk stratification in patients with suspected cancer in treatment naïve prostate glands. It does not address detection of recurrence, progression during active surveillance and evaluation of other parts of the body.PI-RADS™ v2 improves and standardises communication between radiologists and urologists to detect or exclude the presence of significant prostate cancer with a high likelihood. Findings on mpMRI are assessed on a 5-point category scale based on the probability that a combination of findings on T2-weighted (T2w) sequences, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) correlates with the presence of a clinically significant prostate cancer at a particular location. PI-RADS assessment categories range from 1 to 5 with 5 being most likely to represent clinically significant prostate cancer. The dominant sequence to detect prostate cancer in the peripheral zone is DWI, whereas for tumour detection in the transition zone T2w is the most important sequence. DCE-MRI has been attributed a minor role and only qualitative assessment with presence or absence of focal enhancement is suggested. Up to four suspicious lesions of category 3, 4 and 5 are assigned on a sector map and the index lesion should be identified.

Indexed as

CommunicationContrast MediaData DisplayDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedInterprofessional RelationsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstateProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsRadiology Information SystemsContrast MediaMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)Prostate cancerProstate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS™ v2)

Identifiers

PMID27067275
PMCPMC4828836
OpenAlexW2323327442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.