SynthesisBMC health services research2016
A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- General practice workforce retention strategies: an umbrella review.BMC primary care · 2026Pooled it
- Determining factors in the retention of physicians in rural and underdeveloped areas: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2020Pooled it
- Addressing the crisis of GP recruitment and retention: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Pooled it
- From training to practice: a longitudinal study on the retention and career entry of young general practitioners in Czechia.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Rural Practice Made Attractive: A Scoping Review of Rural Primary Care Physician Recruitment and Retention Incentives.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Physicians shortage in primary care: a protocol for updating a systematic review of recruitment and retention strategies.F1000Research · 2026Article
- Understanding the contextual and causal factors shaping the work of receptionists in general practice: a realist review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Rural doctor quota students in Germany - who are they? Data on first year students from two cohorts in the federal state of Saxony.Medical education online · 2025Article
- The agenda-setting process for urban family physician program within Iran's health insurance.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Strengthening care for adults with palliative care needs in high-income rural communities: a global policy environmental scan.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- General practitioners' attitudes and motivation to supervise medical students in clinical placements: a questionnaire study from Norway.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Exploring the motivations and challenges of private dental practitioners in rural India: A qualitative analysis.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Developing the intention to pursue a general practice career: a longitudinal survey study from medical school graduation into postgraduate medical training.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Attitudes of medical students in Croatia toward rural medicine education and practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of wage structure and ability on the incentives for practitioners to engage in primary care in China: a mathematical analysis based on the incentive mechanism of heterogeneous practitioners and tripartite evolutionary game.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Better Together? A Mediation Analysis of French General Practitioners' Performance in Multi Professional Group Practice.Health services insights · 2025Article
- Retention strategies for medical doctors in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): are they effective? A scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Comparing GPs according to their model of practice: are multiprofessional group practices associated with more favourable working conditions?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Effects of task-shifting from primary care physicians to nurses: an overview of systematic reviews.Human resources for health · 2024Review
- Influencing physician distribution through education: a qualitative study on retention in Japan's rural hospitals.BMC medical education · 2024Article
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a workforce crisis in primary care. Previous research has looked at the reasons underlying recruitment and retention problems, but little research has looked at what works to improve recruitment and retention. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate interventions and strategies used to recruit and retain primary care doctors internationally.
methodsA systematic review was undertaken. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and grey literature were searched from inception to January 2015. Articles assessing interventions aimed at recruiting or retaining doctors in high income countries, applicable to primary care doctors were included. No restrictions on language or year of publication. The first author screened all titles and abstracts and a second author screened 20%. Data extraction was carried out by one author and checked by a second. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity.
resultsFifty-one studies assessing 42 interventions were retrieved. Interventions were categorised into thirteen groups: financial incentives (n = 11), recruiting rural students (n = 6), international recruitment (n = 4), rural or primary care focused undergraduate placements (n = 3), rural or underserved postgraduate training (n = 3), well-being or peer support initiatives (n = 3), marketing (n = 2), mixed interventions (n = 5), support for professional development or research (n = 5), retainer schemes (n = 4), re-entry schemes (n = 1), specialised recruiters or case managers (n = 2) and delayed partnerships (n = 2). Studies were of low methodological quality with no RCTs and only 15 studies with a comparison group. Weak evidence supported the use of postgraduate placements in underserved areas, undergraduate rural placements and recruiting students to medical school from rural areas. There was mixed evidence about financial incentives. A marketing campaign was associated with lower recruitment.
conclusionsThis is the first systematic review of interventions to improve recruitment and retention of primary care doctors. Although the evidence base for recruiting and care doctors is weak and more high quality research is needed, this review found evidence to support undergraduate and postgraduate placements in underserved areas, and selective recruitment of medical students. Other initiatives covered may have potential to improve recruitment and retention of primary care practitioners, but their effectiveness has not been established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.