ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2016
Exploring behavioural determinants relating to health professional reporting of medication errors: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Common Barriers to Reporting Medical Errors.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2021Pooled it
- Understanding Medication Errors Through Patient Complaints in a Danish University Hospital.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Development of a multicomponent intervention to improve medication error reporting among healthcare professionals: a theory-informed approach using the behaviour change wheel and the theoretical domains framework in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Exploring multidimensional determinants of medication error reporting in China: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Differences between professionals' views on patient safety culture in long-term and acute care? A cross-sectional study.Leadership in health services (Bradford, England) · 2021Article
- Knowledge, perceived barriers and facilitators of medication error reporting: a quantitative survey in Malaysian primary care clinics.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2020Article
- The role of organizational and professional cultures in medication safety: a scoping review of the literature.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2019Article
- Communication interventions in adult and pediatric oncology: A scoping review and analysis of behavioral targets.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Quantifying behavioural determinants relating to health professional reporting of medication errors: a cross-sectional survey using the Theoretical Domains Framework.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEffective and efficient medication reporting processes are essential in promoting patient safety. Few qualitative studies have explored reporting of medication errors by health professionals, and none have made reference to behavioural theories. The objective was to describe and understand the behavioural determinants of health professional reporting of medication errors in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
methodsThis was a qualitative study comprising face-to-face, semi-structured interviews within three major medical/surgical hospitals of Abu Dhabi, the UAE. Health professionals were sampled purposively in strata of profession and years of experience. The semi-structured interview schedule focused on behavioural determinants around medication error reporting, facilitators, barriers and experiences. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF; a framework of theories of behaviour change) was used as a coding framework. Ethical approval was obtained from a UK university and all participating hospital ethics committees.
resultsData saturation was achieved after interviewing ten nurses, ten pharmacists and nine physicians. Whilst it appeared that patient safety and organisational improvement goals and intentions were behavioural determinants which facilitated reporting, there were key determinants which deterred reporting. These included the beliefs of the consequences of reporting (lack of any feedback following reporting and impacting professional reputation, relationships and career progression), emotions (fear and worry) and issues related to the environmental context (time taken to report).
conclusionThese key behavioural determinants which negatively impact error reporting can facilitate the development of an intervention, centring on organisational safety and reporting culture, to enhance reporting effectiveness and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27066954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.