Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27066835›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat show stimulus-specific adaptation for frequency, but not for intensity.

Daniel Duque, Xin Wang, Javier Nieto-Diego, Katrin Krumbholz, Manuel S Malmierca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Two Prediction Error Systems in the Nonlemniscal Inferior Colliculus: "Spectral" and "Nonspectral".The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Spatial Processing Is Frequency Specific in Auditory Cortex But Not in the Midbrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel DuqueAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León (INCYL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Xin WangAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León (INCYL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Javier Nieto-DiegoAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León (INCYL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Katrin KrumbholzMRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Manuel S MalmiercaAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León (INCYL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Spain.
Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESMRC Institute of Hearing Research · GBUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U135097128Medical Research Council MC_UU_00010/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrophysiological and psychophysical responses to a low-intensity probe sound tend to be suppressed by a preceding high-intensity adaptor sound. Nevertheless, rare low-intensity deviant sounds presented among frequent high-intensity standard sounds in an intensity oddball paradigm can elicit an electroencephalographic mismatch negativity (MMN) response. This has been taken to suggest that the MMN is a correlate of true change or "deviance" detection. A key question is where in the ascending auditory pathway true deviance sensitivity first emerges. Here, we addressed this question by measuring low-intensity deviant responses from single units in the inferior colliculus (IC) of anesthetized rats. If the IC exhibits true deviance sensitivity to intensity, IC neurons should show enhanced responses to low-intensity deviant sounds presented among high-intensity standards. Contrary to this prediction, deviant responses were only enhanced when the standards and deviants differed in frequency. The results could be explained with a model assuming that IC neurons integrate over multiple frequency-tuned channels and that adaptation occurs within each channel independently. We used an adaptation paradigm with multiple repeated adaptors to measure the tuning widths of these adaption channels in relation to the neurons' overall tuning widths.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalSoundAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleInferior ColliculiNeuronsPsychoacousticsRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID27066835
PMCPMC4828641
OpenAlexW2336148415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.