Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27066792›Full record

ReviewEndocrine2016

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas: growth and aggressiveness.

Kristin Astrid Øystese, Johan Arild Evang, Jens Bollerslev

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Is pituitary MRI screening necessary in cluster headache?Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical and Pathological Aspects of Silent Pituitary Adenomas.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Review
  12. Bioscience reports · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. DoIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristin Astrid ØysteseDepartment of Specialized Endocrinology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. k.a.b.oystese@medisin.uio.no.
Johan Arild EvangDepartment of Specialized Endocrinology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Jens BollerslevDepartment of Specialized Endocrinology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pituitary adenomas (PAs) are common, comprising approximately one third of all intracranial tumors. Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are the most common PAs. Although usually benign, the NFPAs represent therapeutic challenges because of their location close to the optic chiasm and nerves, and the proximity to the pituitary gland. The therapeutic alternatives are surgery and radiation. To date there is no effective medical treatment. NFPAs are classified according to different modalities, but there are no reliable marker of aggressiveness to guide the clinician in monitoring the patient. More information on growth patterns with constituent biological markers are needed to tailor the care of this patient group. Studies characterizing the membrane receptors of NFPAs have shown promising results, which may give rise to the development of medical treatment.

Indexed as

AdenomaHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessPituitary GlandPituitary NeoplasmsPrognosisAggressivenessGrowth kineticsNon-functioning pituitary adenomasPituitary adenomasPrognosisSilent pituitary adenomas

Identifiers

PMID27066792
OpenAlexW2339988748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.