ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2017
Printing of Three-Dimensional Tissue Analogs for Regenerative Medicine.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shaping soft hydrogels into 3D, multiscale, perfusable models using multimodal printing.Biofabrication · 2026Article
- Particle-based hydrogel inks and support matrices for biofabricating structural complexity, soluble gradients, and cell-lined channels in fully granular bioprinted systems.Biofabrication · 2025Article
- Review
- Scaffold-Free Strategies in Dental Pulp/Dentine Tissue Engineering: Current Status and Implications for Regenerative Biological Processes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in 3D skin bioprinting: processes, bioinks, applications and sensor integration.International journal of extreme manufacturing · 2025Review
- Tuneable Recombinant Spider Silk Protein Hydrogels for Drug Release and 3D Cell Culture.Advanced functional materials · 2024Article
- Droplet bioprinting of acellular and cell-laden structures at high-resolutions.Biofabrication · 2024Article
- Application of 3D Bioprinting in Liver Diseases.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Strategies for improving the 3D printability of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink.Theranostics · 2023Review
- Review
- Obturator Manufacturing for Oronasal Fistula after Cleft Palate Repair: A Review from Handicraft to the Application of Digital Techniques.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Acellular Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts from Polymers: Methods, Achievements, Characterization, and Challenges.Polymers · 2022Review
- Effect of Photoinitiator on Precursory Stability and Curing Depth of Thiol-Ene Clickable Gelatin.Polymers · 2021Article
- 3D bioprinting of oligo(poly[ethylene glycol] fumarate) for bone and nerve tissue engineering.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2021Article
- Article
- 3D bioprinting in cardiac tissue engineering.Theranostics · 2021Review
- Physicochemical parameters that underlie inkjet printing for medical applications.Biophysics reviews · 2020Review
- 3D Bioprinting at the Frontier of Regenerative Medicine, Pharmaceutical, and Food Industries.Frontiers in medical technology · 2020Review
- Diffractive small angle X-ray scattering imaging for anisotropic structures.Nature communications · 2019Article
- System configuration optimization for mesoscopic fluorescence molecular tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3-D) cell printing, which can accurately deposit cells, biomaterial scaffolds and growth factors in precisely defined spatial patterns to form biomimetic tissue structures, has emerged as a powerful enabling technology to create live tissue and organ structures for drug discovery and tissue engineering applications. Unlike traditional 3-D printing that uses metals, plastics and polymers as the printing materials, cell printing has to be compatible with living cells and biological matrix. It is also required that the printing process preserves the biological functions of the cells and extracellular matrix, and to mimic the cell-matrix architectures and mechanical properties of the native tissues. Therefore, there are significant challenges in order to translate the technologies of traditional 3-D printing to cell printing, and ultimately achieve functional outcomes in the printed tissues. So it is essential to develop new technologies specially designed for cell printing and in-depth basic research in the bioprinted tissues, such as developing novel biomaterials specifically for cell printing applications, understanding the complex cell-matrix remodeling for the desired mechanical properties and functional outcomes, establishing proper vascular perfusion in bioprinted tissues, etc. In recent years, many exciting research progresses have been made in the 3-D cell printing technology and its application in engineering live tissue constructs. This review paper summarized the current development in 3-D cell printing technologies; focus on the outcomes of the live printed tissues and their potential applications in drug discovery and regenerative medicine. Current challenges and limitations are highlighted, and future directions of 3-D cell printing technology are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.