Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27066784›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2017

Printing of Three-Dimensional Tissue Analogs for Regenerative Medicine.

Vivian K Lee, Guohao Dai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vivian K LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 12180, USA.
Guohao DaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, 12180, USA. daig@rpi.edu.

Funding

Differentiating Embryonic Stem Cells Toward Arterial and Venous Endothelial Cells For Vascular RegenerationR01HL118245 · NHLBI · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI DAI, GUOHAO · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
Control Arterial-Venous Differentiation Using 3-Dimensional Cell Printing TechnolR21HL102773 · NHLBI · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI DAI, GUOHAO · 2010 to 2011
$384k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL118245NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL102773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3-D) cell printing, which can accurately deposit cells, biomaterial scaffolds and growth factors in precisely defined spatial patterns to form biomimetic tissue structures, has emerged as a powerful enabling technology to create live tissue and organ structures for drug discovery and tissue engineering applications. Unlike traditional 3-D printing that uses metals, plastics and polymers as the printing materials, cell printing has to be compatible with living cells and biological matrix. It is also required that the printing process preserves the biological functions of the cells and extracellular matrix, and to mimic the cell-matrix architectures and mechanical properties of the native tissues. Therefore, there are significant challenges in order to translate the technologies of traditional 3-D printing to cell printing, and ultimately achieve functional outcomes in the printed tissues. So it is essential to develop new technologies specially designed for cell printing and in-depth basic research in the bioprinted tissues, such as developing novel biomaterials specifically for cell printing applications, understanding the complex cell-matrix remodeling for the desired mechanical properties and functional outcomes, establishing proper vascular perfusion in bioprinted tissues, etc. In recent years, many exciting research progresses have been made in the 3-D cell printing technology and its application in engineering live tissue constructs. This review paper summarized the current development in 3-D cell printing technologies; focus on the outcomes of the live printed tissues and their potential applications in drug discovery and regenerative medicine. Current challenges and limitations are highlighted, and future directions of 3-D cell printing technology are also discussed.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalRegenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringAnimalsExtracellular MatrixHumansTissue Scaffolds3-D tissue modelCell printingRegenerative medicineTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID27066784
PMCPMC5064823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.