Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27066779›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2016

Generating and predicting high quality action plans to facilitate physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption: results from an experimental arm of a randomised controlled trial.

Dominique Alexandra Reinwand, Rik Crutzen, Vera Storm, Julian Wienert, Tim Kuhlmann, Hein de Vries, Sonia Lippke

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01909349 (Rehabiliation-Aftercare for an Optimal Transfer Into Autonomous Daily Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01909349 nacompletednot on this map

Rehabiliation-Aftercare for an Optimal Transfer Into Autonomous Daily Life (RENATA) - an eHealth Intervention Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorJacobs University Bremen gGmbHRan2013 to 2016Enrolled1,000ConditionsCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, HEART DISEASESArmsself-regulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Parents: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dominique Alexandra ReinwandDepartment of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, Bremen, 28759, Germany. d.reinwand@jacobs-university.de.
Rik CrutzenCAPHRI, Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, P. O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200, MD, The Netherlands.
Vera StormDepartment of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, Bremen, 28759, Germany.
Julian WienertInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Tim KuhlmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany.
Hein de VriesCAPHRI, Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, P. O. Box 616, Maastricht, 6200, MD, The Netherlands.
Sonia LippkeDepartment of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, Bremen, 28759, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to improve the transition from an intention to a change in health behaviour, action planning is a frequently used behavioural change method. The quality of action plans in terms of instrumentality and specificity is important in terms of supporting a successful change in health behaviour. Until now, little has been known about the predictors of action plan generation and the predictors of high quality action plans and, therefore, the current study investigates these predictors.

methodA randomised controlled trial was conducted to improve physical activity (PA) and fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption using a web-based computer tailored intervention. During the 8-week intervention period, participants in the intervention arm (n = 346) were guided (step-by-step) to generate their own action plans to improve their health behaviours. Demographic characteristics, social cognitions, and health behaviour were assessed at baseline by means of self-reporting. Whether participants generated action plans was tracked by means of server registrations within two modules of the intervention.

resultsThe action planning component of the intervention regarding physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption was used by 40.9 and 20.7 % of the participants, respectively. We found that participants who were physically active at baseline were less likely to generate action plans concerning physical activity. With regards to generating fruit and vegetable action plans, participants with a high risk perception and a strong intention to eat fruit and vegetables on a daily basis made more use of the action planning component for this behaviour. Finally, the large majority of the action plans for physical activity (96.6 %) and fruit and vegetable consumption (100 %) were instrumental and about half of the action plans were found to be highly specific (PA = 69.6 %/FV = 59.7 %). The specificity of the action plans is associated with having a relationship and low levels of negative outcome expectancies.

conclusionRisk perception and intention are predictors of using the application of action planning. Increasing the motivation to change behaviour should be prioritised in interventions concerning changes in health behaviour before participants are asked to generate action plans. This would also make the intervention suitable for unmotivated people. For those participants who already perform the desired health behaviour prior to the intervention, action plans might be less relevant. Nevertheless, using a guided step-by-step approach to generate action plans resulted in highly instrumental and specific action plans and might be integrated into other interventions concerning changes in health behaviour.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register: NTR 3706, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01909349 .

Indexed as

FruitHealth BehaviorIntentionMotor ActivityVegetablesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComputer-Assisted InstructionDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedMotivationAction planFruit and vegetable consumptionInstrumentalityPhysical activityPlan qualitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID27066779
PMCPMC4828759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.