Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27066500›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2016

RF-Phos: A Novel General Phosphorylation Site Prediction Tool Based on Random Forest.

Hamid D Ismail, Ahoi Jones, Jung H Kim, Robert H Newman, Dukka B Kc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. FEPS: A Tool for Feature Extraction from Protein Sequence.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hidden dynamic signatures drive substrate selectivity in the disordered phosphoproteome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hamid D IsmailDepartment of Computational Science and Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Ahoi JonesDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Jung H KimDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Robert H NewmanDepartment of Biology, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.
Dukka B KcDepartment of Computational Science and Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.

Funding

Global Analysis of Redox Modification on Protein Kinase FunctionSC2GM113784 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA AGRI & TECH ST UNIV · PI NEWMAN, ROBERT HOWARD · 2015 to 2017
$346k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1SC2GM113784-01NIGMS NIH HHS SC2 GM113784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is one of the most widespread regulatory mechanisms in eukaryotes. Over the past decade, phosphorylation site prediction has emerged as an important problem in the field of bioinformatics. Here, we report a new method, termed Random Forest-based Phosphosite predictor 2.0 (RF-Phos 2.0), to predict phosphorylation sites given only the primary amino acid sequence of a protein as input. RF-Phos 2.0, which uses random forest with sequence and structural features, is able to identify putative sites of phosphorylation across many protein families. In side-by-side comparisons based on 10-fold cross validation and an independent dataset, RF-Phos 2.0 compares favorably to other popular mammalian phosphosite prediction methods, such as PhosphoSVM, GPS2.1, and Musite.

Indexed as

Decision TreesSoftwareComputational BiologyModels, StatisticalPhosphorylationProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID27066500
PMCPMC4811047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.