ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2016
Enhanced Monitoring of the Preterm Infant during Stabilization in the Delivery Room.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Newborn Vitals in the First 10 min Do Not Differ With Mode of Delivery.International journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Transitional circulation and hemodynamic monitoring in newborn infants.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Skin-interfacing wearable biosensors for smart health monitoring of infants and neonates.Communications materials · 2024Review
- The Respiratory Management of the Extreme Preterm in the Delivery Room.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Accuracy of a battery-powered portable capnometer in premature infants.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2022Article
- Response: Commentary: Enhanced Monitoring of the Preterm Infant during Stabilization in the Delivery Room.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring of preterm infants in the delivery room (DR) remains limited. Current guidelines suggest that pulse oximetry should be available for all preterm infant deliveries, and that if intubated a colorimetric carbon dioxide detector should provide verification of correct endotracheal tube placement. These two methods of assessment represent the extent of objective monitoring of the newborn commonly performed in the DR. Monitoring non-invasive ventilation effectiveness (either by capnography or respiratory function monitoring) and cerebral oxygenation (near-infrared spectroscopy) is becoming more common within research settings. In this article, we will review the different modalities available for cardiorespiratory and neuromonitoring in the DR and assess the current evidence base on their feasibility, strengths, and limitations during preterm stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.