ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2016
Comparison of Treatment Costs for Breast Cancer, by Tumor Stage and Type of Service.
Article in American health & drug benefits, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04057391 (Understanding Patient Experience and Preferences for the QT Scanner Compared to Mammography), which is not on this map. Cited by 146 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Understanding Patient Experience and Preferences for the QT Scanner Compared to Mammography
Who cites it
146 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 262 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast cancer screening and early diagnosis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 10.72 million women.BMC women's health · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of Myofascial Therapy on Pain and Functionality of the Upper Extremities in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Vitamin D and breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Development and validation of a model and nomogram for breast cancer diagnosis based on quantitative analysis of serum disease-specific haptoglobin N-glycosylation.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Trial
- Computational reactive-diffusive modeling for stratification and prognosis determination of patients with breast cancer receiving Olaparib.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Financial Toxicity Among Sarcoma Patients During and Following Treatment Across the Lifespan.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of mammography-based breast cancer screening in Jordan: a healthcare system perspective.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Impact of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema on Cancer Care Costs: Longitudinal and Age-Based Analyses.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Experiences and Perspectives of Patients With Early Breast Cancer, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals: Italian Social Media Listening Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Cost of chemotherapy-related care for breast cancer care: evidence and implications from a provider perspective at a public tertiary hospital in South Africa.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Surveillance mammography in older women-should we press on?Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Cost analysis of female breast cancer in Antigua and Barbuda: a prevalence based study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Wearable Sensing Technologies for the Management of Cancer, Diabetes, and COVID-19.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Survival Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients in Texas Using Classical and Machine Learning Methods.Cureus · 2025Article
- Barriers and limitations for undergoing mammography screenings among Kuwaiti women (aged 40-69) attending primary health care centers.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Prolonging Medical Procedures to Exploit the Peak-End Rule: An Ethical Analysis.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Impact of age and treatment-related adverse events on financial toxicity among patients with breast cancer: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Evaluating accountability, transparency, and bias in AI-assisted healthcare decision- making: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives in the UK.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosis of breast cancer at early stages is associated with better clinical and survival outcomes. How the costs of care vary depending on the stage at which breast cancer was diagnosed has not been thoroughly examined.
objectiveTo quantify the stage-dependent average per capita cost of breast cancer treatment for a commercially insured population of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
methodsThis retrospective analysis of claims data was based on a population selected from the Truven Healthcare MarketScan commercial claims database. The study comprised women aged 18 to 64 years with breast cancer who had ≥2 claims in 2010 that were ≥30 days apart and included an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis code for breast cancer (174.xx, 233.0) in any position of the claim. Two years of postdiagnosis claims data were analyzed by stage at diagnosis (ie, 0, I/II, III, and IV).
resultsIn total, 8360 women met the criteria for study inclusion (stage 0, N = 2300; stage I/II, N = 4425; stage III, N = 1134; and stage IV, N = 501). The costs were higher for patients whose cancer was more advanced at diagnosis, for all cumulative 6-month periods (months 0-6, 0-12, 0-18, and 0-24). The average costs per patient allowed by the insurance company in the year after diagnosis were $60,637, $82,121, $129,387, and $134,682 for disease stage 0, I/II, III, and IV, respectively. The average costs allowed per patient in the 24 months after the index diagnosis were $71,909, $97,066, $159,442, and $182,655 for disease stage 0, I/II, III, and IV, respectively. The cost difference based on the stage at diagnosis was largely driven by the cost of chemotherapy and noncancer treatments.
conclusionTreating advanced- versus early-stage breast cancer is associated with significant increases in incremental costs. Knowledge of the relevant stage-specific cost data provides support for strengthening programs, such as breast cancer screening, that are designed to shift breast cancer diagnosis to earlier disease stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27066193PMC4822976W2283955056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.