Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27065995›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

A Novel Triculture System (CC3) for Simultaneous Enzyme Production and Hydrolysis of Common Grasses through Submerged Fermentation.

Vincent V Leo, Ajit K Passari, J Beslin Joshi, Vineet K Mishra, Sivakumar Uthandi, N Ramesh, Vijai K Gupta, Ratul Saikia, Vijay C Sonawane, Bhim P Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent V LeoMolecular Microbiology and Systematics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Mizoram UniversityAizawl, India; Department of Biotechnology, J.J College for Arts and SciencePudukkottai, India.
Ajit K PassariMolecular Microbiology and Systematics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Mizoram University Aizawl, India.
J Beslin JoshiBiocatalysts Lab, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, India.
Vineet K MishraMolecular Microbiology and Systematics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Mizoram University Aizawl, India.
Sivakumar UthandiBiocatalysts Lab, Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, India.
N RameshDepartment of Biotechnology, J.J College for Arts and Science Pudukkottai, India.
Vijai K GuptaMolecular Glyco-biotechnology Group, Department of Biochemistry, National University of Ireland Galway Galway, Ireland.
Ratul SaikiaBiotechnology Division, CSIR-North East Institute of Science and Technology Jorhat, Assam, India.
Vijay C SonawaneBiochemical Engineering Research and Process Development Centre (BERPDC), Institute of Microbial Technology Chandigarh, India.
Bhim P SinghMolecular Microbiology and Systematics Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Mizoram University Aizawl, India.
Mizoram University · INTamil Nadu Agricultural University · INNorth East Institute of Science and Technology · INOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perennial grasses are considered as a rich source of lignocellulosic biomass, making it a second generation alternative energy source and can diminish the use of fossil fuels. In this work, four perennial grasses Saccharum arundinaceum, Panicum antidotale, Thysanolaena latifolia, and Neyraudia reynaudiana were selected to verify their potential as a substrate to produce hydrolytic enzymes and to evaluate them as second generation energy biomass. Here, cellulase and hemi-cellulase producing three endophytic bacteria (Burkholderia cepacia BPS-GB3, Alcaligenes faecalis BPS-GB5 and Enterobacter hormaechei BPS-GB8) recovered from N. reynaudiana and S. arundinaceum were selected to develop a triculture (CC3) consortium. During 12 days of submerged cultivation, a 55-70% loss in dry weight was observed and the maximum activity of β-glucosidase (5.36-12.34 IU) and Xylanase (4.33 to 10.91 IU) were observed on 2nd and 6th day respectively, whereas FPase (0.26 to 0.53 IU) and CMCase (2.31 to 4.65 IU) showed maximum activity on 4th day. Around 15-30% more enzyme activity was produced in CC3 as compared to monoculture (CC1) and coculture (CC2) treatments, suggested synergetic interaction among the selected three bacterial strains. Further, the biomass was assessed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The FTIR analysis provides important insights into the reduction of cellulose and hemicellulose moieties in CC3 treated biomass and SEM studies shed light into the disruption of surface structure leading to access of cellulose or hemicelluloses microtubules. The hydrolytic potential of the CC3 system was further enhanced due to reduction in lignin as evidenced by 1-4% lignin reduction in biomass compositional analysis. Additionally, laccase gene was detected from A. faecalis and E. hormaechei which further shows the laccase production potential of the isolates. To our knowledge, first time we develop an effective endophytic endogenous bacterial triculture system having potential for the production of extracellular enzymes utilizing S. arundinaceum and N. reynaudiana as lignocellulosic feedstock.

Indexed as

FT-IRhydrolytic enzymeslignocellulosic biomassperennial grassesSEMtriculture

Identifiers

PMID27065995
PMCPMC4815437
OpenAlexW2323219022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.