Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27065905›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2016

Learning in Plants: Lessons from Mimosa pudica.

Charles I Abramson, Ana M Chicas-Mosier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fast and Slow Signal Propagation in Abiotic Polypeptide Assemblies.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The "plant neurobiology" revolution.Plant signaling & behavior · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The Cognitive Lens: a primer on conceptual tools for analysing information processing in developmental and regenerative morphogenesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles I AbramsonDepartment of Psychology, Laboratory of Comparative Psychology and Behavioral Biology, Oklahoma State UniversityStillwater, OK, USA; Department of Integrative Biology, Laboratory of Comparative Psychology and Behavioral Biology, Oklahoma State UniversityStillwater, OK, USA.
Ana M Chicas-MosierDepartment of Psychology, Laboratory of Comparative Psychology and Behavioral Biology, Oklahoma State UniversityStillwater, OK, USA; Department of Integrative Biology, Laboratory of Comparative Psychology and Behavioral Biology, Oklahoma State UniversityStillwater, OK, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the early Mimosa pudica literature; much of which is in journals not easily accessible to the reader. In contrast to the contemporary plant learning literature which is conducted primarily by plant biologists, this early literature was conducted by comparative psychologists whose goal was to search for the generality of learning phenomena such as habituation, and classical conditioning using experimental designs based on animal conditioning studies. In addition to reviewing the early literature, we hope to encourage collaborations between plant biologists and comparative psychologists by familiarizing the reader with issues in the study of learning faced by those working with animals. These issues include no consistent definition of learning phenomena and an overreliance on the use of cognition. We suggested that greater collaborative efforts be made between plant biologists and comparative psychologists if the study of plant learning is to be fully intergraded into the mainstream behavior theory.

Indexed as

classical conditioninginstrumental conditioninglearningoperant conditioningplants

Identifiers

PMID27065905
PMCPMC4814444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.