Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27065890›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2016

A Review of Impaired Neuroplasticity in Schizophrenia Investigated with Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Apoorva Bhandari, Daphne Voineskos, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Tarek K Rajji, Daniel M Blumberger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The potential of muscarinic MFrontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sleep, sleep spindles, and cognitive functions in drug-naive patients with first-episode psychosis.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Apoorva BhandariCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Daphne VoineskosDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Zafiris J DaskalakisCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Tarek K RajjiCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Daniel M BlumbergerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral lines of evidence implicate dysfunctional neuronal plasticity in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (SCZ). Aberrant glutamatergic and gamma amino--butyric acid neurotransmission are thought to underlie core cognitive deficits and negative symptoms of SCZ. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) allows for the in vivo study of cortical plasticity and excitability at the systems level of the human motor cortex. This review will focus on summarizing the available neurophysiological evidence for impaired motor cortical plasticity in SCZ assessed by NIBS.

methodsA search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed was performed on the use of NIBS techniques to investigate neuroplasticity in the motor cortex of SCZ patients. The relevant articles were summarized.

conclusionOur review of the literature reveals evidence for disrupted neuroplasticity in SCZ and its close association to alterations in cortical inhibition and dysfunctional intracortical connectivity. Further investigations are required to elucidate the neurobiological mechanisms that underlie dysfunctional plasticity in SCZ in order to develop more targeted therapeutic interventions for SCZ patients.

Indexed as

long-term potentiationmotor cortexneuroplasticityschizophreniatranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27065890
PMCPMC4810231
OpenAlexW2327912716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.