Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27065840›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2016

Neonatal Brain Tissue Classification with Morphological Adaptation and Unified Segmentation.

Richard J Beare, Jian Chen, Claire E Kelly, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Christopher D Smyser, Cynthia E Rogers, Wai Y Loh, Lillian G Matthews, Jeanie L Y Cheong, Alicia J Spittle and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
28.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard J BeareMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Monash UniversityMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jian ChenMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Monash UniversityMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Claire E KellyMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Dimitrios AlexopoulosDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO, USA.
Christopher D SmyserDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO, USA.
Cynthia E RogersDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO, USA.
Wai Y LohMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental HealthMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lillian G MatthewsMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of MelbourneMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Royal Women's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jeanie L Y CheongMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Royal Women's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of MelbourneMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alicia J SpittleMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Royal Women's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, University of MelbourneMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter J AndersonMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of MelbourneMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lex W DoyleMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of MelbourneMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Royal Women's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of MelbourneMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Terrie E InderDepartment of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA, USA.
Marc L SealMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of MelbourneMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Deanne K ThompsonMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's HospitalMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental HealthMelbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of MelbourneMelbourne, VIC, Australia.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUWashington University in St. Louis · USHarvard University · USMonash University · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center-Administrative Down Syndrome SupplementU54HD087011 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CONSTANTINO, JOHN N. · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
PREDICTING CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES IN PRETERM INFANTS USING CEREBRAL CONNECTIVITYK02NS089852 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SMYSER, CHRISTOPHER DANIEL · 2014 to 2018
$848k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD087011NINDS NIH HHS K02 NS089852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the distribution of brain tissue types (tissue classification) in neonates is necessary for studying typical and atypical brain development, such as that associated with preterm birth, and may provide biomarkers for neurodevelopmental outcomes. Compared with magnetic resonance images of adults, neonatal images present specific challenges that require the development of specialized, population-specific methods. This paper introduces MANTiS (Morphologically Adaptive Neonatal Tissue Segmentation), which extends the unified segmentation approach to tissue classification implemented in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) software to neonates. MANTiS utilizes a combination of unified segmentation, template adaptation via morphological segmentation tools and topological filtering, to segment the neonatal brain into eight tissue classes: cortical gray matter, white matter, deep nuclear gray matter, cerebellum, brainstem, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), hippocampus and amygdala. We evaluated the performance of MANTiS using two independent datasets. The first dataset, provided by the NeoBrainS12 challenge, consisted of coronal T 2-weighted images of preterm infants (born ≤30 weeks' gestation) acquired at 30 weeks' corrected gestational age (n = 5), coronal T 2-weighted images of preterm infants acquired at 40 weeks' corrected gestational age (n = 5) and axial T 2-weighted images of preterm infants acquired at 40 weeks' corrected gestational age (n = 5). The second dataset, provided by the Washington University NeuroDevelopmental Research (WUNDeR) group, consisted of T 2-weighted images of preterm infants (born <30 weeks' gestation) acquired shortly after birth (n = 12), preterm infants acquired at term-equivalent age (n = 12), and healthy term-born infants (born ≥38 weeks' gestation) acquired within the first 9 days of life (n = 12). For the NeoBrainS12 dataset, mean Dice scores comparing MANTiS with manual segmentations were all above 0.7, except for the cortical gray matter for coronal images acquired at 30 weeks. This demonstrates that MANTiS' performance is competitive with existing techniques. For the WUNDeR dataset, mean Dice scores comparing MANTiS with manually edited segmentations demonstrated good agreement, where all scores were above 0.75, except for the hippocampus and amygdala. The results show that MANTiS is able to segment neonatal brain tissues well, even in images that have brain abnormalities common in preterm infants. MANTiS is available for download as an SPM toolbox from http://developmentalimagingmcri.github.io/mantis.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingneonatepreterm birthstatistical parametric mappingtissue classification

Identifiers

PMID27065840
PMCPMC4809890
OpenAlexW2312828294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.