ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016
Linear Discriminant Analysis Achieves High Classification Accuracy for the BOLD fMRI Response to Naturalistic Movie Stimuli.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding in the Fourth Dimension: Classification of Temporal Patterns and Their Generalization Across Locations.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Article
- Elucidating the underlying components of metacognitive systematic bias in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Nicotine-related beliefs induce dose-dependent responses in the human brain.Nature. Mental health · 2024Article
- Classification of female MDD patients with and without suicidal ideation using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and machine learning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Identification of Resting-State Network Functional Connectivity and Brain Structural Signatures in Fibromyalgia Using a Machine Learning Approach.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in precision and genomic medicine.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022Review
- Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in naturalistic paradigm functional magnetic resonance imaging.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Cognitive Neuroscience Methods in Enhancing Health Literacy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Studying the visual brain in its natural rhythm.NeuroImage · 2020Review
- Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- Shared Numerosity Representations Across Formats and Tasks Revealed with 7 Tesla fMRI: Decoding, Generalization, and Individual Differences in Behavior.Cerebral cortex communications · 2020Article
- Individual EEG measures of attention, memory, and motivation predict population level TV viewership and Twitter engagement.PloS one · 2019Article
- Accurate Decoding of Short, Phase-Encoded SSVEPs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Article
- The human brain from above: an increase in complexity from environmental stimuli to abstractions.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2017Article
- Decoding the encoding of functional brain networks: An fMRI classification comparison of non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), independent component analysis (ICA), and sparse coding algorithms.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2017Article
- Bold-Independent Computational Entropy Assesses Functional Donut-Like Structures in Brain fMRI Images.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- A Hitchhiker's Guide to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naturalistic stimuli like movies evoke complex perceptual processes, which are of great interest in the study of human cognition by functional MRI (fMRI). However, conventional fMRI analysis based on statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and the general linear model (GLM) is hampered by a lack of accurate parametric models of the BOLD response to complex stimuli. In this situation, statistical machine-learning methods, a.k.a. multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA), have received growing attention for their ability to generate stimulus response models in a data-driven fashion. However, machine-learning methods typically require large amounts of training data as well as computational resources. In the past, this has largely limited their application to fMRI experiments involving small sets of stimulus categories and small regions of interest in the brain. By contrast, the present study compares several classification algorithms known as Nearest Neighbor (NN), Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), and (regularized) Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) in terms of their classification accuracy in discriminating the global fMRI response patterns evoked by a large number of naturalistic visual stimuli presented as a movie. Results show that LDA regularized by principal component analysis (PCA) achieved high classification accuracies, above 90% on average for single fMRI volumes acquired 2 s apart during a 300 s movie (chance level 0.7% = 2 s/300 s). The largest source of classification errors were autocorrelations in the BOLD signal compounded by the similarity of consecutive stimuli. All classifiers performed best when given input features from a large region of interest comprising around 25% of the voxels that responded significantly to the visual stimulus. Consistent with this, the most informative principal components represented widespread distributions of co-activated brain regions that were similar between subjects and may represent functional networks. In light of these results, the combination of naturalistic movie stimuli and classification analysis in fMRI experiments may prove to be a sensitive tool for the assessment of changes in natural cognitive processes under experimental manipulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.