Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27065721›Full record

ArticleScientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading

Individual differences in fifth graders' reading and language predict their comprehension monitoring development: An eye-movement study.

Carol McDonald Connor, Ralph Radach, Christian Vorstius, Stephanie L Day, Leigh McLean, Frederick J Morrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Process and Product of Coherence Monitoring in Young Readers: Effects of Reader and Text Characteristics.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Does Online Comprehension Monitoring Make a Unique Contribution to Reading Comprehension in Beginning Readers? Evidence from Eye Movements.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Reading comprehension of ambiguous sentences by school-age children with autism spectrum disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carol McDonald ConnorArizona State University.
Ralph RadachUniversity of Wuppertal.
Christian VorstiusUniversity of Wuppertal.
Stephanie L DayArizona State University.
Leigh McLeanArizona State University.
Frederick J MorrisonUniversity of Michigan.

Funding

Child-Instruction Interactions Causal Effects on ReadingR01HD048539 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONNOR, CAROL MCDONALD · 2005 to 2010
$2.4M
Developing Dynamic Forecasting Intervention Models for Upper Elementary StudentsR21HD062834 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CONNOR, CAROL MCDONALD · 2010 to 2011
$356k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD048539NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD062834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated fifth-graders' (n=52) fall literacy, academic language, and motivation, and how these skills predicted fall and spring comprehension monitoring on an eye movement task. Comprehension monitoring was defined as the identification and repair of misunderstandings when reading text. In the eye movement task, children read two sentences; the second included either a plausible or implausible word in the context of the first sentence. Stronger readers had shorter reading times overall suggesting faster processing of text. Generally fifth-graders reacted to the implausible word (i.e., longer gaze duration on the implausible v. the plausible word, which reflects lexical access). Students with stronger academic language, compared to those with weaker academic language, generally spent more time re-reading the implausible target compared to the plausible target. This difference increased from fall to spring. Results support the centrality of academic language for meaning integration, setting standards of coherence, and utilizing comprehension repair strategies.

Identifiers

PMID27065721
PMCPMC4824948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.