Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27065367›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2016

Pairing and anti-pairing: a balancing act in the diploid genome.

Eric F Joyce, Jelena Erceg, C-Ting Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Building Haplotype-Resolved 3D Genome Maps of Chicken Skeletal Muscle.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Modeling homologous chromosome recognition via nonspecific interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Transcriptional priming and chromatin regulation during stochastic cell fate specification.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Premeiotic pairing of homologous chromosomes duringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric F JoyceDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States. Electronic address: erjoyce@upenn.edu.
Jelena ErcegDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
C-Ting WuDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States. Electronic address: twu@genetics.med.harvard.edu.

Funding

The inheritance of position: It's not just who you are, it's where you areDP1GM106412 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WU, CHAO-TING · 2012 to 2016
$4.2M
Transvection and somatic homolog pairing in DrosophilaR01GM085169 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WU, CHAO-TING · 2009 to 2012
$2.1M
Exploring the mechanism and function of somatic homolog pairingF32CA157188 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI JOYCE, ERIC F. · 2011 to 2013
$155k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA157188NIGMS NIH HHS DP1 GM106412NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of maternal and paternal homologs appears to be much more than just a doubling of genetic material. We know this because genomes have evolved elaborate mechanisms that permit homologous regions to sense and then respond to each other. One way in which homologs communicate is to come into contact and, in fact, Dipteran insects such as Drosophila excel at this task, aligning all pairs of maternal and paternal chromosomes, end-to-end, in essentially all somatic tissues throughout development. Here, we reexamine the widely held tenet that extensive somatic pairing of homologous sequences cannot occur in mammals and suggest, instead, that pairing may be a widespread and significant potential that has gone unnoticed in mammals because they expend considerable effort to prevent it. We then extend this discussion to interchromosomal interactions, in general, and speculate about the potential of nuclear organization and pairing to impact inheritance.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusChromosome PairingDiploidyDrosophilaGenomeMammalsMeiosis

Identifiers

PMID27065367
PMCPMC4939289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.