Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27065293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2016

Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals Dose-Response Characteristics for Effect of Rhubarb in a Rat Model of Cholestasis.

Cong-En Zhang, Ming Niu, Rui-Yu Li, Wu-Wen Feng, Xiao Ma, Qin Dong, Zhi-Jie Ma, Guang-Quan Li, Ya-Kun Meng, Ya Wang and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Integrated Metabolomics and Network Pharmacology Study on Immunoregulation Mechanisms ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Investigation of Liver Injury ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cong-En ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChengdu, China; China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military HospitalBeijing, China.
Ming NiuChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Rui-Yu LiCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChengdu, China; China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military HospitalBeijing, China.
Wu-Wen FengCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChengdu, China; China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military HospitalBeijing, China.
Xiao MaCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChengdu, China; China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military HospitalBeijing, China.
Qin DongCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChengdu, China; China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military HospitalBeijing, China.
Zhi-Jie MaChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military HospitalBeijing, China; Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityBeijing, China.
Guang-Quan LiCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChengdu, China; China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military HospitalBeijing, China.
Ya-Kun MengChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Ya WangChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Ping YinChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Lan-Zhi HeChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Yu-Meng LiChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Peng TanChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Yan-Ling ZhaoChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Jia-Bo WangChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Xiao-Ping DongCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Chengdu, China.
Xiao-He XiaoChina Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, 302 Military Hospital Beijing, China.
Chinese People's Liberation Army · CNChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholestasis is a serious manifestation of liver diseases with limited therapies. Rhubarb, a widely used herbal medicine, has been frequently used at a relatively large dose for treating cholestasis. However, whether large doses are optimal and the therapeutic mechanism remain unclear. To explore these questions, the anti-cholestatic effect of five doses of rhubarb (0.21, 0.66, 2.10, 6.60, and 21.0 g/kg) in an alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate (ANIT)-induced rat model of cholestasis was examined by histopathology and serum biochemistry. A dose-dependent anti-cholestatic effect of rhubarb (0.21-6.6 g/kg) was observed, and an overdose of 21.0 g/kg showed a poor effect. LC-MS-based untargeted metabolomics together with pathway analysis were further applied to characterize the metabolic alterations induced by the different rhubarb doses. Altogether, 13 biomarkers were identified. The dose-response curve based on nine important biomarkers indicated that doses in the 0.42-6.61 g/kg range (EC20-EC80 range, corresponding to 4.00-62.95 g in the clinic) were effective for cholestasis treatment. The pathway analysis showed that bile acid metabolism and excretion, inflammation and amino acid metabolism were altered by rhubarb in a dose-dependent manner and might be involved in the dose-response relationship and therapeutic mechanism of rhubarb for cholestasis treatment.

Indexed as

cholestasisdose responsemetabolomicspathway analysisrhubarb

Identifiers

PMID27065293
PMCPMC4814850
OpenAlexW2334400043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.