Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27065091›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2016

Unidirectional diploid-tetraploid introgression among British birch trees with shifting ranges shown by restriction site-associated markers.

Jasmin Zohren, Nian Wang, Igor Kardailsky, James S Borrell, Anika Joecker, Richard A Nichols, Richard J A Buggs

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A cryptic syngameon withinEvolutionary applications · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasmin ZohrenSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Nian WangSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Igor KardailskyQIAGEN Aarhus A/S, Silkeborgvej 2, Prismet, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.
James S BorrellSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Anika JoeckerQIAGEN Aarhus A/S, Silkeborgvej 2, Prismet, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.
Richard A NicholsSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Richard J A BuggsSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization may lead to introgression of genes among species. Introgression may be bidirectional or unidirectional, depending on factors such as the demography of the hybridizing species, or the nature of reproductive barriers between them. Previous microsatellite studies suggested bidirectional introgression between diploid Betula nana (dwarf birch) and tetraploid B. pubescens (downy birch) and also between B. pubescens and diploid B. pendula (silver birch) in Britain. Here, we analyse introgression among these species using 51 237 variants in restriction site-associated (RAD) markers in 194 individuals, called with allele dosages in the tetraploids. In contrast to the microsatellite study, we found unidirectional introgression into B. pubescens from both of the diploid species. This pattern fits better with the expected nature of the reproductive barrier between diploids and tetraploids. As in the microsatellite study, introgression into B. pubescens showed clear clines with increasing introgression from B. nana in the north and from B. pendula in the south. Unlike B. pendula alleles, introgression of B. nana alleles was found far from the current area of sympatry or allopatry between B. nana and B. pubescens. This pattern fits a shifting zone of hybridization due to Holocene reduction in the range of B. nana and expansion in the range of B. pubescens.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDiploidyHybridization, GeneticTetraploidyAllelesBetulaChromosome MappingDNA, PlantGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsSequence Analysis, DNAUnited KingdomDNA, PlantGenetic Markersclimate changegenotypinghybridizationintrogressionpolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID27065091
PMCPMC4999052
OpenAlexW2426537181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.