ReviewCognitive neuroscience2017
How changes in white matter might underlie improved reaction time due to practice.
Review in Cognitive neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generalised exponential-Gaussian distribution: a method for neural reaction time analysis.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Cognitive Impairment: Insights from Reaction Time Measures.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2019Article
- The Effects of Martial Arts Training on Attentional Networks in Typical Adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Neural correlates of cognitive processing in monolinguals and bilinguals.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017Review
- White matter and reaction time: Reply to commentaries.Cognitive neuroscience · 2017Article
- Developing brain networks of attention.Current opinion in pediatrics · 2016Review
- Characterization of Structural Connectivity of the Default Mode Network in Dogs using Diffusion Tensor Imaging.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Why does training on a task reduce the reaction time for performing it? New research points to changes in white matter pathways as one likely mechanism. These pathways connect remote brain areas involved in performing the task. Genetic variations may be involved in individual differences in the extent of this improvement. If white matter change is involved in improved reaction time with training, it may point the way toward understanding where and how generalization occurs. We examine the hypothesis that brain pathways shared by different tasks may result in improved performance of cognitive tasks remote from the training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.