Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27064273›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Cervical Abnormalities Are More Common among Indigenous than Other Australian Women: A Retrospective Record-Linkage Study, 2000-2011.

Lisa J Whop, Peter Baade, Gail Garvey, Joan Cunningham, Julia M L Brotherton, Kamalini Lokuge, Patricia C Valery, Dianne L O'Connell, Karen Canfell, Abbey Diaz and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Study protocol:BMJ open · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa J WhopEpidemiology and Health Systems Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Brisbane, Australia.
Peter BaadeCancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Gail GarveyEpidemiology and Health Systems Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Brisbane, Australia.
Joan CunninghamEpidemiology and Health Systems Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Brisbane, Australia.
Julia M L BrothertonVictorian Cytology Service Inc, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kamalini LokugeNational Centre of Epidemiology and Public Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Patricia C ValeryEpidemiology and Health Systems Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Brisbane, Australia.
Dianne L O'ConnellCancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Karen CanfellCancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abbey DiazEpidemiology and Health Systems Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Brisbane, Australia.
David RoderCentre for Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Dorota M GertigSchool of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Suzanne P MooreEpidemiology and Health Systems Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Brisbane, Australia.
John R CondonEpidemiology and Health Systems Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Brisbane, Australia.
Charles Darwin University · AUMenzies School of Health Research · AUCancer Council NSW · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUAustralian National University · AUCancer Council Queensland · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous Australian women have much higher incidence of cervical cancer compared to non-Indigenous women. Despite an organised cervical screening program introduced 25 years ago, a paucity of Indigenous-identified data in Pap Smear Registers remains. Prevalence of cervical abnormalities detected among the screened Indigenous population has not previously been reported. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of population-based linked health records for 1,334,795 female Queensland residents aged 20-69 years who had one or more Pap smears during 2000-2011; from linked hospital records 23,483 were identified as Indigenous. Prevalence was calculated separately for Indigenous and non-Indigenous women, for cytology-detected low-grade (cLGA) and high-grade abnormalities (cHGA), and histologically confirmed high-grade abnormalities (hHGA). Odds ratios (OR) were estimated from logistic regression analysis. In 2010-2011 the prevalence of hHGA among Indigenous women (16.6 per 1000 women screened, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.6-18.9) was twice that of non-Indigenous women (7.5 per 1000 women screened, CI 7.3-7.7). Adjusted for age, area-level disadvantage and place of residence, Indigenous women had higher prevalence of cLGA (OR 1.4, CI 1.3-1.4), cHGA (OR 2.2, CI 2.1-2.3) and hHGA (OR 2.0, CI 1.9-2.1). Our findings show that Indigenous women recorded on the Pap Smear Register have much higher prevalence for cLGA, cHGA and hHGA compared to non-Indigenous women. The renewed cervical screening program, to be implemented in 2017, offers opportunities to reduce the burden of abnormalities and invasive cancer among Indigenous women and address long-standing data deficiencies.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAustraliaCervix UteriCytological TechniquesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeographyHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Invasiveness

Identifiers

PMID27064273
PMCPMC4827842
OpenAlexW2334000289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.