Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27064248›Full record

Observational studyPediatric research2016

Nasogastric feeding tubes from a neonatal department yield high concentrations of potentially pathogenic bacteria- even 1 d after insertion.

Sandra Meinich Petersen, Gorm Greisen, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ESBL-producingEpidemiology and infection · 2025
    Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Scoping Review of the Oral Microbiome in Preterm Infants.American journal of perinatology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra Meinich PetersenDepartment of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gorm GreisenDepartment of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karen Angeliki KrogfeltDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7536-3453
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm infants are vulnerable to pathogens and at risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or sepsis. Nasogastric feeding tubes (NG-tubes) might contaminate feeds given through them due to biofilm formation. We wanted to determine if there is a rationale in replacing NG-tubes more often to reduce contamination.

methodsWe conducted an observational study of used NG-tubes from a tertiary neonatal department. After removal, we flushed a 1-ml saline solution through the tube, determined the density of bacteria by culture, and related it to the duration of use and any probiotic administration through the tube.

resultsOut of the 94 NG-tubes, 89% yielded more than 1,000 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml bacteria, and 55% yielded the potentially pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae and/or Staphylococcus aureus. The mean concentration in the yield was 5.3 (SD: 2.1, maximum 9.4) log10CFU/ml. Neither the presence of contamination nor the density was associated with the time the NG-tube had been in use. Probiotic administration did not protect against contamination.

conclusionNG-tubes yielded high densities of bacteria even within the first day of use. Further studies are needed to determine if changing the NG-tubes between meals or once a day will make a positive impact on tube contamination and clinical parameters.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCatheter-Related InfectionsEnteral NutritionEnterobacteriaceaeEnterocolitis, NecrotizingEquipment ContaminationFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntubation, GastrointestinalMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningProbioticsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID27064248
OpenAlexW2312302423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.