Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27063950›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2016

Enabling the transferability of complex interventions: exploring the combination of an intervention's key functions and implementation.

Mélanie Villeval, Elsa Bidault, Jeannie Shoveller, François Alias, Jean-Charles Basson, Catherine Frasse, Jean-Paul Génolini, Elisabeth Pons, Damien Verbiguié, Pascale Grosclaude and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [An intervention research program (AAPRISS) to reduce social inequalities in health: methods and validation].Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mélanie VillevalLEASP - UMR 1027 INSERM-Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France. melanievilleval@gmail.com.
Elsa BidaultLEASP - UMR 1027 INSERM-Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Jeannie ShovellerSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
François AliasInstance Régionale d'Education et de Promotion de la Santé, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Charles BassonInstitut Fédératif d'Etudes et de Recherches Interdisciplinaires Santé Société, Toulouse, France.
Catherine FrasseRéseau de Prévention et de Prise en Charge de l'Obésité Pédiatrique Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Paul GénoliniInstitut Fédératif d'Etudes et de Recherches Interdisciplinaires Santé Société, Toulouse, France.
Elisabeth PonsService Communal d'Hygiène et de Santé, Toulouse, France.
Damien VerbiguiéToulouse Aviron Sports et Loisirs, Toulouse, France.
Pascale GrosclaudeLEASP - UMR 1027 INSERM-Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
Thierry LangLEASP - UMR 1027 INSERM-Université Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSeveral public health interventions are not described, not evaluated and not transferred. The objective was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of using a description model making a distinction between interventions' transferable elements, and those that are more context-specific, to make their evaluation and transferability easier.

methodsThe theoretical distinction between an intervention function and its form in a specific context has been empirically explored. A community-based intervention (named "Ciné-Ma-Santé") has been described, using a "key function/implementation/context" model. This process has been co-constructed through qualitative research and knowledge exchange process between project leaders and researchers from different disciplines.

resultsThe use of the model proves feasible and useful for both project leaders and researchers. Nine key functions were described, as well as their implementation and the features of the intervention context.

conclusionsRendering explicit key functions of public health interventions could constitute a useful step to their evaluation and transfer. It enables the formulation of hypotheses regarding the potentially standardizable elements of interventions, and elements that can be modified while maintaining the integrity of the intervention.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesPublic Health PracticeCommunity ParticipationEpidemiologyHealth EducationHealth EducatorsHealth PromotionHumansModels, TheoreticalPolicyProgram EvaluationPsychology, SocialQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsCommunity-based interventionComplex interventionsIntervention descriptionSocial inequalities in healthTransferability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.