ReviewJournal of fluorescence2016
Signal Improvement Strategies for Fluorescence Detection of Biomacromolecules.
Review in Journal of fluorescence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Capillary Integrated SERS System Inspired by Bee-Hive Bionics: Enabling Dynamic Multi-Component Detection of Trace Biomolecules.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Innovative Cerium and Chromium Co-doped Carbon Quantum Dots: Synthesis, Smartphone-Compatible and Sensitive Fluorescence Approach for Detection of Vitamin BJournal of fluorescence · 2025Review
- Detection of Pyrophosphate and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity Based on PolyT Single Stranded DNA - Copper Nanoclusters.Journal of fluorescence · 2022Article
- Review
- A novel controlled release tetrandrine-loaded PDLLA film: evaluation of drug release and anti-adhesion effects in vitro and in vivo.Drug delivery and translational research · 2020Article
- Update on biomaterials for prevention of epidural adhesion after lumbar laminectomy.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For analysis of biomacromolecules, a sensitive, specified and reliable method is indispensable. Fluorescent dyes or fluorophores have been widely used as mediums to obtain readout signals in various assays or bioimaging because of their versatilities such as biocompatibility. Those fluorescent dyes based techniques manipulate many molecular interactions for analysis of biomacromolecules including antibody-protein interaction, base complementation, glycan-lectin interaction, etc. The strategies to manipulate those molecular interactions are various and always updating due to the development of biotechnological tools and instruments. In this minireview, we summarize the state of the art of signal improvement techniques for fluorescence detection of biomacromolecules especially proteins and nucleic acids. We focus on the principle and mechanism of those techniques for fluorescence detection of biomacromolecules. We also discuss the future trend of the techniques for fluorescence detection of biomacromolecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.