Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27063729›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2016

E-health and health care behaviour of parents of young children: a qualitative study.

Anne C van der Gugten, Rob J R J de Leeuw, Theo J M Verheij, Cornelis K van der Ent, Marijke C Kars

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Profile of the Users and the Most Visited Topics of a Pediatric eHealth Website.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mobile and Online Health Information: Exploring Digital Media Use among Austrian Parents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Validation of a Questionnaire Developed to Evaluate a Pediatric eHealth Website for Parents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne C van der Gugtena Department of Pediatric Pulmonology , Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands ;
Rob J R J de Leeuwb Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands.
Theo J M Verheijb Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands.
Cornelis K van der Enta Department of Pediatric Pulmonology , Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands ;
Marijke C Karsb Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLWilhelmina Children's Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInternet plays a huge role in providing information about health care problems. However, it is unknown how parents use and perceive the internet as a source of information and how this influences health care utilisation when it comes to common complaints in infants. The objective was to evaluate the perception parents have on the role of internet in providing health care information on common symptoms in infants and its effects on health care utilisation.

designA qualitative design was chosen. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: Parents were recruited from a population-based birth-cohort and selected purposefully.

main outcome measuresSemi-structured interviews were used to receive information of parents' ideas. Thematic coding and constant comparison were used for interview transcript analysis.

resultsTen parents were interviewed. Parents felt anxious and responsible when their child displayed common symptoms, and appeared to be in need of information. They tried to obtain information from relatives, but more so from the internet, because of its accessibility. Nevertheless, information found on the internet had several limitations, evoked new doubts and insecurity and although parents compared information from multiple sources, only the physician was able to take away the insecurity. The internet did not interfere in the decision to consult the physician.

conclusionsParents need information about their children's symptoms and the internet is a major resource. However, only physicians could take away their symptom-related doubts and insecurities and internet information did not play a role in parental decision making. Information gathered online may complement the information from physicians, rather than replace it. Key points Internet plays an increasing role in providing health care information but it is unknown how this influences health care utilisation. Our study suggests that: Parents need information about their children's symptoms and the internet is a major resource. However, only physicians could take away their symptom-related doubts and insecurities. Internet information did not play a role in parental decision making.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthInformation Seeking BehaviorPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultConsumer Health InformationFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInternetInterviews as TopicMaleNetherlandsParentscommon illnessesConsultationgeneral practicepediatricsprimary careproceduresThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID27063729
PMCPMC4977935
OpenAlexW2332331790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.