ReviewNeurologia medico-chirurgica2016
Surgical Management of Intracranial Artery Dissection.
Review in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemodynamic differences between intracranial and extracranial dissecting aneurysms: An analysis of shear forces and their clinical implications.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Microsurgical partial trapping for the treatment of unclippable vertebral artery aneurysms: Experience from 27 patients and review of literature.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Article
- Advantages of Extradural Anterior Clinoidectomy and Extradural Approach with Dural Incision for Blood Blister Aneurysm or Pseudoaneurysm in the Internal Carotid Artery: Two Case Reports.NMC case report journal · 2023Article
- Superficial Temporal Artery-middle Cerebral Artery Anastomosis for Ischemic Stroke due to Dissection of the Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery with Middle Cerebral Artery Extension.NMC case report journal · 2018Article
- Overlapping stent-assisted coil embolization for a ruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissection.Journal of surgical case reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial artery dissection (IAD) is a relatively rare cause of stroke, but it has been recognized increasingly with recent advances of the neuroimaging technique. Since rebleeding occurs frequently in the acute stage in the ruptured IAD, urgent surgical treatment should be performed to prevent rebleeding. On the other hand, surgical treatment for unruptured IAD is controversial because it has little risk for bleeding. However, surgical treatment for unruptured IAD may be considered if the formation or enlargement of the aneurysmal dilatation has been confirmed. Since there are several proposed surgical strategies for IAD, it is important to select an appropriate strategy on a case-by-case basis. If the risk of infarction due to vessel occlusion is high, combined bypass surgery should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.