Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27062991›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Comparative genetic characterization of Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains recovered from clinical and non-clinical settings.

Rong Zhang, Dan-xia Gu, Yong-lu Huang, Edward Wai-Chi Chan, Gong-Xiang Chen, Sheng Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. EnteroaggregativeEcoSal Plus · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. EnteroaggregativePeerJ · 2021
    Article
  11. ESBL ProducingFrontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-ProducingFrontiers in public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rong ZhangSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Dan-xia GuSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yong-lu HuangSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Edward Wai-Chi ChanShenzhen Key lab for Food Biological Safety Control, Food Safety and Technology Research Center, Hong Kong PolyU Shen Zhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, P. R. China.
Gong-Xiang ChenSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Sheng ChenShenzhen Key lab for Food Biological Safety Control, Food Safety and Technology Research Center, Hong Kong PolyU Shen Zhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, P. R. China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of pathogenic Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC), a major causative agent of childhood diarrhea worldwide, remains ill-defined. The objective of this study was to determine the relative prevalence of EAEC in clinical and non-clinical sources and compare their genetic characteristics in order to identify strains that rarely and commonly cause human diarrhea. The virulence gene astA was commonly detectable in both clinical and non-clinical EAEC, while clinical isolates, but not the non-clinical strains, were consistently found to harbor other virulence factors such as aap (32%), aatA (18%) and aggR (11%). MLST analysis revealed the extremely high diversity of EAEC ST types, which can be grouped into three categories including: (i) non-clinical EAEC that rarely cause human infections; (ii) virulent strains recoverable in diarrhea patients that are also commonly found in the non-clinical sources; (iii) organisms causing human infections but rarely recoverable in the non-clinical setting. In addition, the high resistance in these EAEC isolates in particular resistance to fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins raised a huge concern for clinical EAEC infection control. The data from this study suggests that EAEC strains were diversely distributed in non-clinical and clinical setting and some of the clinical isolates may originate from the non-clinical setting.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesCephalosporinsDiarrheaDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFluoroquinolonesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingPrevalenceVirulence FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsFluoroquinolonesVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID27062991
PMCPMC4827025
OpenAlexW2316435598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.