Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27062398›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurochemistry2016

Proteome rearrangements after auditory learning: high-resolution profiling of synapse-enriched protein fractions from mouse brain.

Thilo Kähne, Sandra Richter, Angela Kolodziej, Karl-Heinz Smalla, Rainer Pielot, Alexander Engler, Frank W Ohl, Daniela C Dieterich, Constanze Seidenbecher, Wolfgang Tischmeyer and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurochemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thilo KähneInstitute of Experimental Internal Medicine, Medical School, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Sandra RichterInstitute of Experimental Internal Medicine, Medical School, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Angela KolodziejLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Karl-Heinz SmallaLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Rainer PielotLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Alexander EnglerLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Frank W OhlLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Daniela C DieterichCenter for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany.
Constanze SeidenbecherLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Wolfgang TischmeyerLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael NaumannInstitute of Experimental Internal Medicine, Medical School, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Eckart D GundelfingerLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9377-7414
Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DELeibniz Institute for Neurobiology · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning and memory processes are accompanied by rearrangements of synaptic protein networks. While various studies have demonstrated the regulation of individual synaptic proteins during these processes, much less is known about the complex regulation of synaptic proteomes. Recently, we reported that auditory discrimination learning in mice is associated with a relative down-regulation of proteins involved in the structural organization of synapses in various brain regions. Aiming at the identification of biological processes and signaling pathways involved in auditory memory formation, here, a label-free quantification approach was utilized to identify regulated synaptic junctional proteins and phosphoproteins in the auditory cortex, frontal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum of mice 24 h after the learning experiment. Twenty proteins, including postsynaptic scaffolds, actin-remodeling proteins, and RNA-binding proteins, were regulated in at least three brain regions pointing to common, cross-regional mechanisms. Most of the detected synaptic proteome changes were, however, restricted to individual brain regions. For example, several members of the Septin family of cytoskeletal proteins were up-regulated only in the hippocampus, while Septin-9 was down-regulated in the hippocampus, the frontal cortex, and the striatum. Meta analyses utilizing several databases were employed to identify underlying cellular functions and biological pathways. Data are available via ProteomeExchange with identifier PXD003089. How does the protein composition of synapses change in different brain areas upon auditory learning? We unravel discrete proteome changes in mouse auditory cortex, frontal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum functionally implicated in the learning process. We identify not only common but also area-specific biological pathways and cellular processes modulated 24 h after training, indicating individual contributions of the regions to memory processing.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysBrainCytoskeletal ProteinsDiscrimination LearningGene Expression RegulationMaleMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhosphoproteinsProteomeSignal TransductionSynapsesCytoskeletal ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProteomeauditory learningchemical synapselabel-free quantificationlearning and memoryphosphoproteomicsquantitative mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID27062398
PMCPMC5089584
OpenAlexW2332102003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.