Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27062381›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2017

FLOW-i ventilator performance in the presence of a circle system leak.

Umberto Lucangelo, Miloš Ajčević, Agostino Accardo, Massimo Borelli, Alberto Peratoner, Lucia Comuzzi, Walter A Zin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Umberto LucangeloDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, Intensive Care and Emergency, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy. u.lucangelo@fmc.units.it.
Miloš AjčevićDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Agostino AccardoDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Massimo BorelliDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Alberto PeratonerDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, Intensive Care and Emergency, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Lucia ComuzziDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, Intensive Care and Emergency, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Walter A ZinCarlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
University of Trieste · ITUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the FLOW-i anaesthesia ventilator was developed based on the SERVO-i intensive care ventilator. The aim of this study was to test the FLOW-i's tidal volume delivery in the presence of a leak in the breathing circuit. We ventilated a test lung model in volume-, pressure-, and pressure-regulated volume-controlled modes (VC, PC, and PRVC, respectively) with a FLOW-i. First, the circuit remained airtight and the ventilator was tested with fresh gas flows of 6, 1, and 0.3 L/min in VC, PC, and PRVC modes and facing 4 combinations of different resistive and elastic loads. Second, a fixed leak in the breathing circuit was introduced and the measurements repeated. In the airtight system, FLOW-i maintained tidal volume (VT) and circuit pressure at approximately the set values, independently of respiratory mode, load, or fresh gas flow. In the leaking circuit, set VT = 500 mL, FLOW-i delivered higher VTs in PC (about 460 mL) than in VC and PRVC, where VTs were substantially less than 500 mL. Interestingly, VT did not differ appreciably from 6 to 0.3 L/min of fresh air flow among the 3 ventilatory modes. In the absence of leakage, peak inspiratory pressures were similar, while they were 35-45 % smaller in PRVC and VC than in PC mode in the presence of leaks. In conclusion, FLOW-i maintained VT (down to fresh gas flows of 0.3 L/min) to 90 % of its preset value in PC mode, which was 4-5 times greater than in VC or PRVC modes.

Indexed as

Critical CareVentilators, MechanicalAnesthesia, Closed-CircuitCarbon DioxideEquipment DesignGasesHumansLinear ModelsOxygenPositive-Pressure RespirationPressureRespirationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory MechanicsTidal VolumeCarbon DioxideGasesOxygenAir leaksLow flow anaesthesiaMechanical loadsVentilatory modalityVolume reflector

Identifiers

PMID27062381
OpenAlexW2319113918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.