Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27062271›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2016

Measuring insulin adherence among adults with type 2 diabetes.

Chandra Y Osborn, Jeffery S Gonzalez

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Injectable Antihyperglycemics: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of the Literature on Adherence, Persistence, and Health Outcomes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chandra Y OsbornDepartment of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Health and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave. Suite 370, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA. chandra.osborn@vanderbilt.edu.
Jeffery S GonzalezFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Vanderbilt Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK092986 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELASY, TOM A · 2011 to 2020
$6.7M
Emotional Distress in a Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Diabetes TreatmentsR01DK104845 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHERRINGTON, ANDREA L, GONZALEZ, JEFFREY S · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Improving Medication Adherence among Underserved Patients with Type 2 DiabetesR01DK100694 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAYBERRY, LINDSAY S. · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
Translating telephonic diabetes self-management support to primary care practiceR18DK098742 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI GONZALEZ, JEFFREY S, WU, WINFRED YOUNG · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Leveraging Patient Portals to Improve Medication Adherence in Type 2 DiabetesK01DK087894 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI OSBORN, CHANDRA Y. · 2011 to 2015
$710k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK087894NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092986NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100694NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104845NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK098742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-adherence to insulin is common and associated with suboptimal health. We adapted the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale to specify insulin adherence (MIAS) and compared it to the Adherence to Refills and Medication Scale for Diabetes (ARMS-D) and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities medications subscale (SDSCA-MS) and an insulin-specific (SDSCA-IS) version. A sample of 144 insulin-treated adults (58 % African American/Black, 34 % Caucasian/White, 8 % Other/Mixed race; 6.9 % Hispanic) completed these measures along with a HbA1C test. The internal consistency and factor structure of the MIAS were adequate; 59 % of participants forgot to take insulin and 46 % reported non-adherence. The MIAS was associated with the ARMS-D, SDSCA-MS, and SDSCA-IS (p < 0.001), and higher MIAS scores were marginally associated with better self-rated health (p = 0.057), but significantly associated with fewer emergency room visits (p = 0.001), and better HbA1C (p = 0.001). The MIAS is a valid and reliable insulin adherence assessment tool for practice and research applications.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMiddle AgedSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin therapyMeasurementMedication adherenceType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID27062271
PMCPMC4945416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.