Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27061961›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2016

Point-of-sale promotion of breastmilk substitutes and commercially produced complementary foods in Cambodia, Nepal, Senegal and Tanzania.

Mary Champeny, Catherine Pereira, Lara Sweet, Mengkheang Khin, Aminata Ndiaye Coly, Ndeye Yaga Sy Gueye, Indu Adhikary, Shrid Dhungel, Cecilia Makafu, Elizabeth Zehner and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perspective: Structure-Function Claims on Infant Formula.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mary ChampenyHelen Keller International, Washington, DC., USA.
Catherine PereiraJB Consultancy, Bryanston, South Africa.
Lara SweetJB Consultancy, Bryanston, South Africa.
Mengkheang KhinHelen Keller International, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Aminata Ndiaye ColyHelen Keller International, Dakar, Senegal.
Ndeye Yaga Sy GueyeHelen Keller International, Dakar, Senegal.
Indu AdhikaryHelen Keller International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Shrid DhungelConsultant to Helen Keller International.
Cecilia MakafuHelen Keller International, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Elizabeth ZehnerHelen Keller International, Washington, DC., USA.
Sandra L HuffmanConsultant to Helen Keller International.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIn order to assess the prevalence of point-of-sale promotions of infant and young child feeding products in Phnom Penh, Cambodia; Kathmandu Valley, Nepal; Dakar Department, Senegal; and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, approximately 30 retail stores per site, 121 in total, were visited. Promotional activity for breastmilk substitutes (BMS) and commercially produced complementary foods in each site were recorded. Point-of-sale promotion of BMS occurred in approximately one-third of sampled stores in Phnom Penh and Dakar Department but in 3.2% and 6.7% of stores in Kathmandu Valley and Dar es Salaam, respectively. Promotion of commercially produced complementary foods was highly prevalent in Dakar Department with half of stores having at least one promotion, while promotions for these products occurred in 10% or less of stores in the other three sites. While promotion of BMS in stores is legal in Senegal, it is prohibited in Cambodia without prior permission of the Ministry of Health/Ministry of Information and prohibited in both Nepal and Tanzania. Strengthening legislation in Senegal and enforcing regulations in Cambodia could help to prevent such promotion that can negatively affect breastfeeding practices. KEY MESSAGES: Even in countries such as Cambodia, Nepal and Tanzania where point-of-sale promotion is restricted, promotions of BMS were observed (in nearly one-third of stores in Phnom Penh and less than 10% in Dar es Salaam and Kathmandu). Limited promotion of commercially produced complementary foods was evident (less than 10% of stores had a promotion for such foods), except in Dakar Department, where promotions were found in half of stores. Efforts are needed to strengthen monitoring, regulation and enforcement of restrictions on the promotion of BMS. Manufacturers and distributors should take responsibility for compliance with national regulations and global policies pertaining to the promotion of breastmilk substitutes.

Indexed as

BeveragesFood LabelingInfant FoodInfant FormulaMilk SubstitutesCambodiaDeveloping CountriesFast FoodsFood, FortifiedHumansInfantNepalSenegalSnacksTanzaniaUrban Health

Identifiers

PMID27061961
PMCPMC5071702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.