Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27061957›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2016

Promotion and consumption of commercially produced foods among children: situation analysis in an urban setting in Senegal.

Alison B Feeley, Aminata Ndeye Coly, Ndeye Yaga Sy Gueye, Elhadji Issakha Diop, Alissa M Pries, Mary Champeny, Elizabeth R Zehner, Sandra L Huffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Violations in the marketing of milks and complementary foods that compete with breastfeeding in Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2022
    Article
  16. The nutrition transition to a stage of high obesity and noncommunicable disease prevalence dominated by ultra-processed foods is not inevitable.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alison B FeeleyJB Consultancy, Bryanston, South Africa.
Aminata Ndeye ColyHelen Keller International, Dakar, Senegal.
Ndeye Yaga Sy GueyeHelen Keller International, Dakar, Senegal.
Elhadji Issakha DiopHelen Keller International, Africa Regional Office, Dakar, Senegal.
Alissa M PriesHelen Keller International, Asia Pacific Regional Office, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Mary ChampenyHelen Keller International, Washington, DC, USA.
Elizabeth R ZehnerHelen Keller International, Washington, DC, USA.
Sandra L HuffmanConsultant to Helen Keller International.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the promotion of commercially produced foods and consumption of these products by children less than 24 months of age in Dakar Department, Senegal. Interviews with 293 mothers of children attending child health clinics assessed maternal exposure to promotion and maternal recall of foods consumed by the child on the preceding day. Promotion of breastmilk substitutes and commercially produced complementary foods outside health facilities was common with 41.0% and 37.2% of mothers, respectively, reporting product promotions since the birth of their youngest child. Promotion of commercially produced snack food products was more prevalent, observed by 93.5% of mothers. While all mothers reported having breastfed their child, only 20.8% of mothers breastfed their newborn within the first hour after delivery, and 44.7% fed pre-lacteal feeds in the first 3 days after delivery. Of children 6-23 months of age, 20.2% had consumed a breastmilk substitute; 49.1% ate a commercially produced complementary food, and 58.7% ate a commercially produced snack food product on the previous day. There is a need to stop the promotion of breastmilk substitutes, including infant formula, follow-up formula, and growing-up milks. More stringent regulations and enforcement could help to eliminate such promotion to the public through the media and in stores. Promotion of commercial snack foods is concerning, given the high rates of consumption of such foods by children under the age of 2 years. Efforts are needed to determine how best to reduce such promotion and encourage replacement of these products with more nutritious foods.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant FoodInfant FormulaNutrition PolicyPatient ComplianceCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesDietFast FoodsFemaleFood LabelingHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMothersbreast milk substituteschild feedingcomplementary feedingcomplementary foodsinfant and child nutritioninfant feeding

Identifiers

PMID27061957
PMCPMC5071683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.