Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27061347›Full record

ReviewGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2016

Proximate and ultimate causes of variable visual sensitivities: Insights from cichlid fish radiations.

Karen L Carleton, Brian E Dalton, Daniel Escobar-Camacho, Sri Pratima Nandamuri

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evolutionary dynamics of pre- and postzygotic reproductive isolation in cichlid fishes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Royal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen L CarletonDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Brian E DaltonDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Daniel Escobar-CamachoDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Sri Pratima NandamuriDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Evolutionary mechanisms controlling opsin gene expression variationR01EY024639 · NEI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CARLETON, KAREN L · 2014 to 2020
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals vary in their sensitivities to different wavelengths of light. Sensitivity differences can have fitness implications in terms of animals' ability to forage, find mates, and avoid predators. As a result, visual systems are likely selected to operate in particular lighting environments and for specific visual tasks. This review focuses on cichlid vision, as cichlids have diverse visual sensitivities, and considerable progress has been made in determining the genetic basis for this variation. We describe both the proximate and ultimate mechanisms shaping cichlid visual diversity using the structure of Tinbergen's four questions. We describe (1) the molecular mechanisms that tune visual sensitivities including changes in opsin sequence and expression; (2) the evolutionary history of visual sensitivity across the African cichlid flocks; (3) the ontological changes in visual sensitivity and how modifying this developmental program alters sensitivities among species; and (4) the fitness benefits of spectral tuning mechanisms with respect to survival and mating success. We further discuss progress to unravel the gene regulatory networks controlling opsin expression and suggest that a simple genetic architecture contributes to the lability of opsin gene expression. Finally, we identify unanswered questions including whether visual sensitivities are experiencing selection, and whether similar spectral tuning mechanisms shape visual sensitivities of other fishes. genesis 54:299-325, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AnimalsCichlidsEvolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationLightOpsinsRod OpsinsSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityVision, OcularOpsinsRod Opsinsgene expressionopsinretinavision

Identifiers

PMID27061347
PMCPMC4912907
OpenAlexW2336236629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.