Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27061283›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2016

The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce, 2014.

Lin Fritschi, Julie Crewe, Ellie Darcey, Alison Reid, Deborah C Glass, Geza P Benke, Tim Driscoll, Susan Peters, Si Si, Michael J Abramson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hospital Readmission Due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Longitudinal Study.International journal of health policy and management · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lin FritschiSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia. lin.fritschi@curtin.edu.au.
Julie CreweSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia.
Ellie DarceySchool of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia.
Alison ReidSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia.
Deborah C GlassMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Geza P BenkeMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tim DriscollSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Susan PetersSchool of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Si SiSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia.
Michael J AbramsonMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Renee N CareySchool of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is very little information available on a national level as to the number of people exposed to specific asthmagens in workplaces.

methodsWe conducted a national telephone survey in Australia to investigate the prevalence of current occupational exposure to 277 asthmagens, assembled into 27 groups. Demographic and current job information were obtained. A web-based tool, OccIDEAS, was used to collect job task information and assign exposure to each asthmagen group.

resultsIn the Australian Workplace Exposure Study - Asthma (AWES- Asthma) we interviewed 4878 participants (2441 male and 2437 female). Exposure to at least one asthmagen was more common among men (47%) than women (40%). Extrapolated to the Australian population, approximately 2.8 million men and 1.7 million women were estimated to be exposed. Among men, the most common exposures were bioaerosols (29 %) and metals (27%), whilst the most common exposures among women were latex (25%) and industrial cleaning and sterilising agents (20%).

conclusionsThis study provides information about the prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in Australian workplaces which will be useful in setting priorities for control and prevention of occupational asthma.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAerosolsAnimalsArthropodsAsthma, OccupationalAustraliaDetergentsFemaleHumansIndustryLatexMaleMetalsMiddle AgedMitesAerosolsDetergentsLatexMetalsOccupational asthmaSurveillanceWorkplace exposure

Identifiers

PMID27061283
PMCPMC4826519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.