Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27061083›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2016

Outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent or new primary squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck treated with curative intent reirradiation at Mayo Clinic.

Kelly K Curtis, Helen J Ross, Ashley L Garrett, Theresa A Jizba, Ajay B Patel, Samir H Patel, William W Wong, Michele Y Halyard, Stephen J Ko, Heidi E Kosiorek and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. MR-guided stereotactic radiation therapy for head and neck cancers.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly K CurtisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA. Curtis.kelly1@mayo.edu.
Helen J RossDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Ashley L GarrettDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Theresa A JizbaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
Ajay B PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Samir H PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
William W WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Michele Y HalyardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Stephen J KoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Heidi E KosiorekDepartment of Biomedical Statistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Robert L FooteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe reviewed outcomes of patients with loco-regionally recurrent (LRR) or new primary (NP) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) treated at our institution with reirradiation (RRT).

methodsPatients received definitive RRT (DRRT) or post-operative RRT following salvage surgery (PRRT) from 2003 to 2011. Measured survival outcomes included loco-regional relapse free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS).

resultsAmong 81 patients (PRRT, 42; DRRT, 39), median PRRT and DRRT doses were 60 Gy (12-70 Gy) and 69.6 Gy (48-76.8 Gy). The majority of patients received IMRT-based RRT (n = 77, 95 %). With median follow-up of 78.1 months (95 % CI, 56-96.8 months), 2-year OS was 53 % with PRRT and 48 % with DRRT (p = 0.12); 23 % of patients were alive at last follow-up. LRFS at 2 years was 60 %, and did not differ significantly between PRRT and DRRT groups. A trend toward inferior LRFS was noted among patients receiving chemotherapy with RRT versus RRT alone (p = 0.06). Late serious toxicities were uncommon, including osteoradionecrosis (2 patients) and carotid artery bleeding (1 patient, non-fatal).

conclusionsOS of PRRT- and DRRT-treated patients in this series appears superior to the published literature. We used IMRT for the majority of patients, in contrast to several series and trials previously reported, which may account in part for this difference. Future studies should seek to improve outcomes among patients with LRR/NP SCCHN via alternative therapeutic modalities such as proton radiotherapy and by incorporating novel systemic agents.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProportional Hazards ModelsRadiation DosageRadiometryRecurrent squamous cell carcinoma head and neckReirradiationSurvival outcomesToxicity

Identifiers

PMID27061083
PMCPMC4826496
OpenAlexW2322152904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.