ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2016
A Late Life Risk Index for Severe Cognitive Impairment in Mexico.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Discriminative performance of externally validated dementia risk prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Multi-domain prognostic models used in middle-aged adults without known cognitive impairment for predicting subsequent dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Combining modifiable risk factors and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Drought and cognitive function in older adults: results from the Mexican health and aging study.Environment international · 2026Article
- Population-level trends in self-reported healthcare utilization among older adults in Mexico with and without cognitive impairment.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Dementia risk prediction modelling in low- and middle-income countries: current state of evidence.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2024Review
- Effect of Demographic and Health Dynamics on Cognitive Status in Mexico between 2001 and 2015: Evidence from the Mexican Health and Aging Study.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Risk Factors for Incident Dementia Among Older Cubans.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- The effect of educational attainment on cognition of older adults: results from the Mexican Health and Aging Study 2001 and 2012.Aging & mental health · 2019Article
- Memory and language cognitive data harmonization across the United States and Mexico.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- What's New in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling? An Updated Systematic Review.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extraReview
- The Mexican Cognitive Aging Ancillary Study (Mex-Cog): Study Design and Methods.Archives of gerontology and geriatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral dementia risk indices have been developed for older adults in high-income countries. However, no index has been developed for populations in low- or middle-income countries.
objectiveTo create a risk index for predicting severe cognitive impairment among adults aged ≥60 in Mexico and to compare the accuracy of this index to the Dementia Screening Indicator (DSI).
methodsThis study included 3,002 participants from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS) interviewed in 2001 and 2012. The MHAS risk index included sociodemographic, health, and functional characteristics collected in 2001. A point value based on the beta coefficients from a multivariable logistic regression model was assigned to each risk factor and the total score was calculated.
resultsThe MHAS risk index (AUC = 0.74 95% CI = 0.70-0.77) and DSI (AUC = 0.72 95% CI = 0.69-0.77) had similar accuracy for discriminating between participants who developed severe cognitive impairment from those who did not. A score of ≥16 on the MHAS risk index had a sensitivity of 0.69 (95% CI = 0.64-0.70) and specificity of 0.67 (95% CI = 0.66-0.69). A score of ≥23 on the DSI had a sensitivity of 0.56 (95% CI = 0.50-0.63) and specificity of 0.78 (95% CI = 0.76-0.79). DISCUSSION: The MHAS risk index and DSI have moderate accuracy for predicting severe cognitive impairment among older adults in Mexico. This provides evidence that existing dementia risk indices may be applicable in low- and middle-income countries such as Mexico. Future research should seek to identify additional risk factors that can improve the accuracy of the MHAS risk index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.