Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27060790›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Durability of Vaccine-Induced Immunity Against Tetanus and Diphtheria Toxins: A Cross-sectional Analysis.

Erika Hammarlund, Archana Thomas, Elizabeth A Poore, Ian J Amanna, Abby E Rynko, Motomi Mori, Zunqiu Chen, Mark K Slifka

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Serologic Immunity to Tetanus in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2015-2016.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erika HammarlundDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University.
Archana ThomasDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University.
Elizabeth A PooreNajít Technologies,Beaverton.
Ian J AmannaNajít Technologies,Beaverton.
Abby E RynkoDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University.
Motomi MoriBiostatistics Shared Resource, Knight Cancer Institute.
Zunqiu ChenDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Mark K SlifkaDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University.

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Development of an H2O2-Inactivated Dengue Virus VaccineR01AI098723 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SLIFKA, MARK K · 2012 to 2016
$7.3M
Development of a Safe and Effective Vaccine Against West Nile VirusU01AI082196 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SLIFKA, MARK K · 2009 to 2012
$7.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI098723NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI082196NIH HHS 8P51 OD011092-53NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany adult immunization schedules recommend that tetanus and diphtheria vaccination be performed every 10 years. In light of current epidemiological trends of disease incidence and rates of vaccine-associated adverse events, the 10-year revaccination schedule has come into question.

methodsWe performed cross-sectional analysis of serum antibody titers in 546 adult subjects stratified by age or sex. All serological results were converted to international units after calibration with international serum standards.

resultsApproximately 97% of the population was seropositive to tetanus and diphtheria as defined by a protective serum antibody titer of ≥0.01 IU/mL. Mean antibody titers were 3.6 and 0.35 IU/mL against tetanus and diphtheria, respectively. Antibody responses to tetanus declined with an estimated half-life of 14 years (95% confidence interval, 11-17 years), whereas antibody responses to diphtheria were more long-lived and declined with an estimated half-life of 27 years (18-51 years). Mathematical models combining antibody magnitude and duration predict that 95% of the population will remain protected against tetanus and diphtheria for ≥30 years without requiring further booster vaccination.

conclusionsThese studies demonstrate that durable levels of protective antitoxin immunity exist in the majority of vaccinated individuals. Together, this suggests that it may no longer be necessary to administer booster vaccinations every 10 years and that the current adult vaccination schedule for tetanus and diphtheria should be revisited.

Indexed as

Diphtheria-Tetanus VaccineImmunization ScheduleAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, BacterialAntibody FormationCross-Sectional StudiesDiphtheria ToxinFemaleHalf-LifeHumansImmunization, SecondaryMaleMiddle AgedTetanus ToxinAntibodies, BacterialDiphtheria-Tetanus VaccineDiphtheria ToxinTetanus Toxincross-sectional analysisdiphtheriaimmunological memorytetanus

Identifiers

PMID27060790
PMCPMC4826453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.