Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27060702›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Transposable Element Targeting by piRNAs in Laurasiatherians with Distinct Transposable Element Histories.

Michael W Vandewege, Roy N Platt, David A Ray, Federico G Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Transposable element and host silencing activity in gigantic genomes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mammalian transposable elements and their impacts on genome evolution.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael W VandewegeDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University.
Roy N PlattDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University.
David A RayDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University federico.g.hoffmann@gmail.com david.4.ray@gmail.com.
Federico G HoffmannDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University federico.g.hoffmann@gmail.com david.4.ray@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PIWI proteins and PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are part of a cellular pathway that has evolved to protect genomes against the proliferation of transposable elements (TEs). PIWIs and piRNAs assemble into complexes that are involved in epigenetic and post-transcriptional repression of TEs. Most of our understanding of the mechanisms of piRNA-mediated TE silencing comes from fruit fly and mouse models. However, even in these well-studied animals it is unclear how piRNA responses relate to variable TE expression and whether the strength of the piRNA response affects TE content over time. Here, we assessed the evolutionary interactions between TE and piRNAs in a statistical framework using three nonmodel laurasiatherian mammals as a study system: dog, horse, and a vesper bat. These three species diverged ∼80 million years ago and have distinct genomic TE contents. By comparing species with distinct TE landscapes, we aimed to identify clear relationships among TE content, expression, and piRNAs. We found that the TE subfamilies that are the most transcribed appear to elicit the strongest "ping-pong" response. This was most evident among long interspersed elements, but the relationships between expression and ping-pong pilRNA (piRNA-like) expression were more complex among SINEs. SINE transcripts were equally abundant in the dog and horse yet new SINE insertions were relatively rare in the horse genome, where we identified a stronger piRNA response. Our analyses suggest that the piRNA response can have a strong impact on the TE composition of a genome. However, our results also suggest that the presence of a robust piRNA response is apparently not sufficient to stop TE mobilization and accumulation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene SilencingSelection, GeneticAnimalsChiropteraDNA Transposable ElementsDogsHorsesMiceRNA, Small InterferingTranscription, GeneticDNA Transposable ElementsRNA, Small Interferingcomparative genomicsevolutionping-pong cyclePIWI proteinssmall RNAs

Identifiers

PMID27060702
PMCPMC4898795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.