Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27060374›Full record

ReviewExperimental eye research2016

Astrocyte structural reactivity and plasticity in models of retinal detachment.

Gabriel Luna, Patrick W Keeley, Benjamin E Reese, Kenneth A Linberg, Geoffrey P Lewis, Steven K Fisher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental eye research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Developmental Expression of the Cell Cycle Regulator p16The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Retinal Plasticity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Ocular Versus Oral Propranolol for Prevention and/or Treatment of Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy in a Rat Model.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriel LunaNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, USA; Center for Bio-image Informatics, University of California Santa Barbara, USA.
Patrick W KeeleyNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, USA.
Benjamin E ReeseNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, USA.
Kenneth A LinbergNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, USA.
Geoffrey P LewisNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, USA; Center for Bio-image Informatics, University of California Santa Barbara, USA.
Steven K FisherNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, USA; Center for Bio-image Informatics, University of California Santa Barbara, USA; Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, USA. Electronic address: steven.k.fisher@lifesci.ucsb.edu.

Funding

Development of Retinal Bipolar CellsR01EY019968 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI REESE, BENJAMIN E · 2010 to 2023
$4.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although retinal neurodegenerative conditions such as age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, retinitis pigmentosa, and retinal detachment have different etiologies and pathological characteristics, they also have many responses in common at the cellular level, including neural and glial remodeling. Structural changes in Müller cells, the large radial glia of the retina in retinal disease and injury have been well described, that of the retinal astrocytes remains less so. Using modern imaging technology to describe the structural remodeling of retinal astrocytes after retinal detachment is the focus of this paper. We present both a review of critical literature as well as novel work focusing on the responses of astrocytes following rhegmatogenous and serous retinal detachment. The mouse presents a convenient model system in which to study astrocyte reactivity since the Mϋller cell response is muted in comparison to other species thereby allowing better visualization of the astrocytes. We also show data from rat, cat, squirrel, and human retina demonstrating similarities and differences across species. Our data from immunolabeling and dye-filling experiments demonstrate previously undescribed morphological characteristics of normal astrocytes and changes induced by detachment. Astrocytes not only upregulate GFAP, but structurally remodel, becoming increasingly irregular in appearance, and often penetrating deep into neural retina. Understanding these responses, their consequences, and what drives them may prove to be an important component in improving visual outcome in a variety of therapeutic situations. Our data further supports the concept that astrocytes are important players in the retina's overall response to injury and disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCatsCell PlasticityDisease Models, AnimalEpendymoglial CellsHumansMiceMice, Mutant StrainsRatsRats, Long-EvansRetinal DetachmentRetinal Ganglion CellsSciuridaeAstrocyteAstrocyte hypertrophy astrocyte remodelingAstrocyte reactivityAstrocyte structural plasticityGliaRetinal astrocytesRetinal detachment

Identifiers

PMID27060374
PMCPMC5031520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.