Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27060342›Full record

ArticleIntegrative cancer therapies2016

Using a Whole Person Approach to Support People With Cancer: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Service Evaluation.

Marie J Polley, Rachel Jolliffe, Emily Boxell, Catherine Zollman, Sarah Jackson, Helen Seers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative cancer therapies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing for informal caregivers of people with cancer-a multicentred study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  8. Supporting self-management in palliative care throughout the cancer care trajectory.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie J PolleyUniversity of Westminster, London, UK m.polley01@westminster.ac.uk.
Rachel JolliffePenny Brohn UK, Bristol, UK.
Emily BoxellPenny Brohn UK, Bristol, UK.
Catherine ZollmanPenny Brohn UK, Bristol, UK.
Sarah JacksonPenny Brohn UK, Bristol, UK.
Helen SeersPenny Brohn UK, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Improved models of care are needed to meet all the support needs of people with cancer, which encompass psychological, emotional, physical, spiritual, sexual, occupational, social and existential needs. The aim of this article is to (a) evaluate short- and long-term impacts of using a whole person approach to support people with cancer on the Living Well with the Impact of Cancer Course (LWC) and (b) use these data to inform strategic decisions about future service provision at Penny Brohn UK. Methods Longitudinal mixed-methods service evaluation (n = 135). Data collected included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (FACIT-SpEx); Concerns (types and severity-MYCaW); lifestyle behavior (bespoke questionnaire), and participants' experiences over 12 months postcourse. Results Statistically and clinically significant improvements from baseline to 12 months in severity of MYCaW Concerns (n = 64; P < .000) and mean total HRQoL (n = 66; P < .000). The majority of MYCaW concerns were "psychological and emotional" and about participants' well-being. Spiritual, emotional, and functional well-being contributed most to HRQoL improvements at 12 months. Barriers to maintaining healthy lifestyle changes included lack of support from family and friends, time constraints, and returning to work. Three to 6 months postcourse was identified as the time when more support was most likely to be needed. Conclusions Using a whole person approach for the LWC enabled the needs of participants to be met, and statistically and clinically significant improvements in HRQoL and MYCaW Concerns were reported. Qualitative data analysis explored how experiencing whole person support enabled participants to make and sustain healthy lifestyle changes associated with improved survivorship. Barriers experienced to making health behavior change were also identified. These data then informed wider and more person-centered clinical provision to increase the maintenance of positive long-term behavior changes. Comparison of whole person approaches to cancer treatment and support and standard care are now urgently needed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSocial SupportSurveys and Questionnairescancerevaluationhealth-related quality of lifehealthy lifestyle changesMYCaW concernsspiritual well-beingwhole person approach

Identifiers

PMID27060342
PMCPMC5739159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.